Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 106 Part 2.djvu/123

 PUBLIC LAW 102-366—SEPT. 4, 1992 106 STAT. 1003 (9) the dollar amount of work performed by the firm by type of construction owner, including the Federal Government, State and local governments, other public entities, and private entities, in each of fiscal years 1990, 1991, and 1992; (10) the dollar amount of such work bonded by a corporate surety company for the firm by type of construction owner, including construction owners referred to in paragraph (9), for each of fiscal years 1990, 1991, and 1992; (11) whether the firm purchased its corporate surety bonds through an insurance agent or directly from a surety company; (12) the means used by the firm to identify its source for the purchase of corporate surety bonds; (13) the average corporate surety bond premium (expressed as a percentage of contract amount) paid by the firm in fiscal year 1992; (14) any increase or decrease in the average corporate surety bond premium (expressed as a percentage of the contract amount) paid by the firm in fiscal years 1990, 1991, and 1992 and the reason for any increase or decrease, if known; (15) whether or not the underwriting requirements (including state of accounts receivable, financial procedures, need for personal indemnification, and requirements for collateral) changed in fiscal year 1990, 1991, or 1992; (16) the nature of any changes in underwriting requirements experienced by the firm in fiscal years 1990, 1991, and 1992 and the reason for any such chemiges, if known; (17) whether or not the source of surety bonds (a surety agent or company) provided reasons for such changes in underwriting requirements and whether these reasons were provided orally or in writing; (18) whether or not the bonding capacity (total dollar amount and number of bonds) for the firm changed in fiscal year 1990, 1991, or 1992; (19) whether or not the source of surety bonds (a surety agent or company) provided reasons for any changes in bonding capacity and whether these reasons were provided orally or in writing; (20) the services provided and advice given by the firm's source of corporate surety bonds in fiscal years 1990, 1991, and 1992; (21) whether or not the firm obtained a corporate surety bond with the assistance of a Federal program (such as the surety bond guarantee program of the Small Business Administration and the bonding assistance program of the Department of Transportation) or a State or local program in fiscal year 1990, 1991, or 1992; (22) whether or not the firm used any alternative to corporate surety bonds (such as individual surety bonds, letters of credit, certificates of deposit, and government securities) in fiscal year 1990, 1991, or 1992; (23) if the firm has not provided any corporate surety bonds in fiscal year 1990, 1991, or 1992, the reasons the firm has not done so; (24) the number of times the firm has had an application for a corporate surety bond denied in fiscal years 1990, 1991, and 1992, and the reason for any such denial, if known;

�