Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 105 Part 2.djvu/358

 105 STAT. 1310 PUBLIC LAW 102-190—DEC. 5, 1991 (d) FISCAL YEAR 1992 FUNDING FOR B-IB PROCUREMENT. —(1) Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for the Air Force for fiscal year 1992 for the procurement of aircraft, $202,700,000 shall be available for the B-IB bomber program. (2) Of the amount referred to in paragraph (1), not more than $20,000,000 may be obligated to obtain level three technical drawings for the CORE ECM S3rstem. Those funds may not be expended for the procurement of hardware or for implementation of the CORE configuration modification to the B-IB aircraft. (3) Of the amount referred to in paragraph (1), not more than $67,000,000 may be obligated for deferred logistics activities. (4) No amount may be obligated for a purpose stated in paragraph (2) or (3) until a period of 15 calendar days has elapsed after the reports required by subsections (a), (b), and (c) have been submitted to the congressional defense committees. (e) REPEAL OF AUTHORITY FOR FUNDING FOR B-IB AVIONICS MODI- FICATIONS.—Subsection (f) of section 121 of Public Law 101-189 (103 Stat. 1380) is repealed. if) PROHIBITION REGARDING RADAR WARNING RECEIVER PROJECT. — Funds may not be obligated to carry out project 3895 contained in Air Force program element 64270F. SEC. 133. C-17 AIRCRAFT PROGRAM. (a) USE OF AUTHORIZED APPROPRIATIONS. — Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Air Force for aircraft procurement by section 103, not more than the following amounts may be made available for procurement of the C-17 aircraft for fiscal year 1992: (1) $1,525,203,000 for procurement. (2) $122,424,000 for advance procurement. (3) $126,200,000 for spare parts. Reports. (b) LIMITATION FOR FiscAL YEAR 1992. —Of the funds appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 1992 that are made available for the C-17 aircraft program (other than funds for advance procurement), not more thsin $400,000,000 may be obligated for the procurement of C-17 aircraft until the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report that— (1) describes the total cost to complete the full-scale development contract for that aircraft, identifying both the total cost to be borne by the Government and those costs to be borne solely by the contractor; (2) contains a projection of how potential cost overruns under that contract would affect subsequent production contract prices; (3) includes a certification by the Secretary that the first flight of the first development aircraft under that program, and the first flight of the first production aircraft under that program, have both been completed; (4) sets forth in detail all reductions made in performance specifications for the C-17 aircraft since the signing of the original development contract under the program; and (5) includes a certification by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (made after consultation with the commanders of the unified and specified combatant commands)— (A) that the reductions in performance specifications referred to in paragraph (4) do not reduce the military utility

�