Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 104 Part 6.djvu/230

 104 STAT. 4620 PUBLIC LAW 101-640—NOV. 28, 1990 Canada. State listing. (1) PAJARO RIVER, SANTA CRUZ, CAUFORNiA.— The project for flood control, Pajaro River and tributaries, Santa Cruz, California, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1421). (2) SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CAUFORNIA.—The modification for sealing the east jetty of the project for Santa Cruz Harbor, California, authorized by section 811 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4168). (3) HiLLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA.—Dredging of Hillsboro Inlet, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090). (4) LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, INDIANA.— The project for flood control. Little Calumet River basin (Cady Marsh Ditch), Indiana, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4115). (5) LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY LEVEE, LOUISIANA. —The project for flood control, Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, Mississippi River, Louisiana, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4117). (6) ONTONAGON HARBOR, MICHIGAN.— The project for navigation, Ontonagon Harbor, Michigan, authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Appropriations Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 655). (7) OTTAWA RIVER HARBOR, MICHIGAN AND OHIO.—The project for navigation, Ottawa River Harbor, Michigan and Ohio, authorized by section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1073) and approved by committee resolution, in accordance with the Phase I General Design Memorandum for such project, dated November 1976, at a total cost of $13,200,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $6,530,000 and an estimated non- Federal cost of $6,670,000. (8) SAULT SAINTE MARIE, MICHIGAN.—The second lock for Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan, authorized by section 1149 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254-55); except that the Secretary shall conduct, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and after providing an opportunity for notice and comment, an ginalysis of the projected total tonnage of commercial cargo which will be delivered by vessels using such lock to or from ports in Canada and the States of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York. Such analysis shall be based on the Secretary's estimate, using current traffic statistics. (9) (DoNNEAUT, OHIO.— The small boat harbor project for C!onneaut, Ohio, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1405). (10) FAIRPORT, OHIO,—The small boat harbor project for Fairport, Ohio, and the dredging of the navigation project for Fairport, Ohio, authorized pursuant to section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-f). (11) MEMPHIS HARBOR, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE. —The project for navigation, Memphis Harbor, Memphis, Tennessee, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4145). (12) EAST FORK OF TRINITY RIVER, TEXAS. —The project for flood protection on the East Fork of the Trinity River, Texas, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1185).

�