Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 104 Part 6.djvu/229

 PUBLIC LAW 101-640—NOV. 28, 1990 104 STAT. 4619 (2) WARROAD HARBOR, MINNESOTA. — A navigation project to dredge the navigation channel and adjacent basin at Warroad Harbor, Minnesota. The project shall be undertaken to provide Marine safety. safe boating access and egress and to upgrade existing retaining walls. (3) BUFFALO, NEW YORK.— A navigation project south of the existing dike disposal area in Buffalo, New York, by construction of a breakwater, fishing pier, and floating docks. (4) ROCHESTER, NEW YORK.— A navigation project for the mouth of the Genesee River in Rochester, New York, by development and implementation of wave surge control measures. SEC. 104. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. (a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. — The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following projects and, after completion of such study, shall carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s): (1) DRY JORDAN AND CROOKED CREEKS, ARKANSAS.—A prOJect for flood control, Dry Jordan and Crooked Creeks, Harrison, Arkansas, including construction of improvements to provide enhanced flood control and recreation benefits. (2) OLD SULFUR CREEK, ORLEANS, INDIANA.— A project for flood control. Old Sulfur Creek, Orleans, Indiana. (3) FARMERS BRANCH CREEK, WHITE SETTLEMENT, TEXAS.— A nonstructural project for flood control, Farmers Branch Creek, White Settlement, Texas. Such project shall consist of relocation and purchase of residential structures located within the flood plain and shall be carried out on an expedited basis. (4) KROUTS CREEK, WEST VIRGINIA. —A project for flood control, Krouts Creek in the vicinity of Huntington, West Virginia, including deepening and widening of the channel and culvert replacement. (b) SAYAN GUT, VIRGIN ISLANDS.— (1) MAXIMUM ALLOTMENT. — The maximum amount which may be allotted under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) for the project for flood control, Savan Gut, Virgin Islands, shall be $10,000,000 instead of $5,000,000. (2) COST SHARING.—Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as affecting any cost sharing requirements applicable to the project under the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. SEC. 105. BAY CITY, MICHIGAN. The Secretary may undertake a project for shoreline protection along the Saginaw River in Bay City, Michigan, at a total estimated cost of $6,105,000. SEC. 106. DELAWARE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, PENNSYLVANIA. The Secretary may carry out a project for shoreline protection for the Glen Foerd Historic Property in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, along the Delaware River and tributaries, including restoration of seawalls. SEC. 107. CONTINUATION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN PROJECTS. (a) GENERAL RULE. — Notwithstanding section 1001(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the following projects shall remain authorized to be carried out by the Secretary:

�