Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 104 Part 6.djvu/221

 PUBLIC LAW 101-640—NOV. 28, 1990 104 STAT. 4611 estimated first Federal cost of $11,675,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $4,585,000. (26) PETERSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA.—The project for flood control, Petersburg, West Virginia: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 29, 1990, at a total cost of $17,904,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $10,044,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $7,860,000. 0)) PROJECT SUBJECT TO FAVORABLE REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS.— The project for flood control, Los Angeles County Drainage Area, California, at a total cost of $327,000,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $163,500,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $163,500,000, is authorized to be prosecuted by the Secretary in accordance with a final report of the Chief of Engineers and with such modifications as are recommended by the Secretary. No construction on the project may be initiated until such a report of the Chief of Engineers is issued and approved by the Secretary. SEC. 102. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS. (a) VILLAGE CREEK, ALABAMA.—The project for flood control. Village Creek, Alabama, authorized by section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4111), is modified to authorize the Secretary to acquire private vacant lands within the definite project boundaries established in the Real Estate Design Memorandum, dated March 4, 1988, as a nonstructural element of the project. (b) KoDiAK HARBOR, ALASKA.—The project for navigation, Kodiak Harbor, Alaska, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4091), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $25,000,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $22,500,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $2,500,000. (c) Los ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, SAN PEDRO BAY, CAUFORNIA.— Section 4(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4015) is amended by inserting after "approved by the Secretary" in the first sentence the following: "or which is carried out after approval of the final report by the Secretary and which is determined by the Secretary to be compatible with the project". (d) SACRAMENTO DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CAUFORNIA.— The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, California, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), is modified to direct the Secretary, if requested by a non-Federal sponsor, to enforce, on a reimbursable basis, the terms of any permit issued by the Secretary under section 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1151; 33 U.S.C. 403), commonly known as the Rivers and Harbors Appropriations Act of 1899, to compel the relocation of any utility necessitated by the construction of such project. (e) SANTA ANA MAINSTEM, CAUFORNIA.— The project for fiood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, including Santiago Creek, California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113), is modified to authorize the Secretary to develop recreational traiLs and facilities on lands between Seven Oaks Dam and Prado Dam, including fiood plain management areas.

�