Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 102 Part 2.djvu/929

 PUBLIC LAW 100-456—SEPT. 29, 1988

102 STAT. 1933

respect to the operational and developmental tests of the BIGEYE bomb, each of the following: (1) That the operational and developmental tests conducted in connection with such program after the date of the enactment of this Act were realistic and adequate. (2) That the plan and objectives for those tests were clear, well defined, and properly quantifiable. (3) That the design of those tests supports a valid statistical analysis of data. (4) That the criteria for a no-test were adequately defined in the plan for those tests. (5) That the performance of such bomb in those tests met or exceeded the standards established for the tests. (6) That the BIGEYE bomb program is otherwise ready to proceed into full-scale production. (f) FISCAL YEAR 1989 AUTHORIZED AcnviriES.—Of amounts appro-

priated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 1989, $15,000,000 may be obligated or expended for procurement for the BIGEYE program without regard to the limitations contained elsewhere in this section, but only for the purposes of maintaining program continuity, maintaining the subcontractor base, and procuring piece parts and components. Such funds may not be obligated or expended for low-rate initial production or for final assembly. SEC. 117. MANAGEMENT OF CERTAIN DEFENSE PROCUREMENT PRO- 10 USC 2431 GRAMS note. (a) STRETCHOUT IMPACT STATEMENT.—The Secretary of Defense

shall submit to Congress, at the same time the budget for any fiscal year is submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, a statement of what the effect would be during the fiscal year for which the budget is submitted of the stretchout of a major defense acquisition program if either of the following applies with respect to that program: (1) The final year of procurement scheduled for the program at the time the statement is submitted is more than two years later than the final year of procurement for the program as specified in the most recent annual Selected Acquisition Report for that program. (2) The proposed procurement quantity for that fiscal year is less than 90 percent of the procurement quantity proposed for the same fiscal year in the most recent annual Selected Acquisition Report for that program. 0)) CHANGES IN CERTAIN COSTS TO B E INCLUDED.—A statement

under subsection (a) with respect to a major defense acquisition program shall contain an estimate of the projected increase in unit cost and the projected increase in total program cost for the system being procured under the program compared to the program specified in the most recent annual Selected Acquisition Report for that program. (c) IDENTIFICATION OF STRETCHED OUT PROGRAMS.—The Secretary

shall include in a statement under subsection (a) identification of all major acquisition programs for which the proposed procurement quantity for that fiscal year is less than 80 percent of the baseline production rate for that fiscal year, as defined by section 2432(c)(3)(C)(i) of title 10, United States Code, and an explanatory statement for the lower procurement rate for each program.

io^io>i r» Qi

i>„_i o

Qft. rki 9

�