Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 100 Part 5.djvu/674

 100 STAT. 4148

PUBLIC LAW 99-662—NOV. 17, 1986 FIVE MILE CREEK, DALLAS, TEXAS

The project for flood protection along Five Mile Creek, Dallas, Texas, including dredging of a channel at the lower end of such creek and developing a retention structure at the upper end of such creek, at a total cost of $1,460,000. FOX RIVER CHANNEL, GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN

33 USC 577.

The project to deepen the Fox River Channel, Green Bay, Wisconsin, to a depth of twenty-seven feet, at a total cost of $3,460,000. (d) SECTION 107 PROJECTS.—The Secretary is authorized and directed to carry out the following projects under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960: LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA

Subject to section 903(a) of this Act, the project to maintain the Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California, at a depth sufficient for ferry boat service between Marin County and San Francisco, California, at a total cost of $3,340,000. SHELBURNE BAY, VERMONT

The project for navigation at LaPlatte River, Shelburne Bay, Vermont, at a total cost of $250,000. RUDEE INLET, VIRGINIA

The project for navigation and shoreline protection, Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, Virginia: Report of the Division Engineer, dated February 4, 1983, at a total cost of $1,270,000. AGAT SMALL BOAT HARBOR, GUAM

Subject to section 903(a) of this Act, the project to construct the Agat small boat harbor in Guam, at a total cost of $4,040,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $2,816,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $1,224,000. SEC. 602. LAKES PROGRAM.

Minnesota. Indiana.

New Jersey. Minnesota.

New Jersey.

(a) Subject to section 903(a) of this Act, the Secretary shall carry out programs for the removal of silt, aquatic growth, and other material in the following lakes: (1) Albert Lea Lake, Freeborn County, Minnesota, removal of silt and aquatic growth; (2) Lake George, Hobart, Indiana, and in that part of Deep River upstream of such lake through Lake Station, Indiana, removal of silt, aquatic growth, and other material and construction of silt traps or other devices to prevent and abate the deposit of sediment in Lake George and such part of Deep River; (3) Greenwood Lake and Belcher Creek, New Jersey, removal of silt and stamps; (4) Sauk Lake and its tributary streams in the vicinity of Sauk Centre, Stearns County, Minnesota, removal of silt and aquatic growth; (5) Deal Lake, Monmouth County, New Jersey, removal of silt and stumps and the control of pollution from nonpoint sources;

�