Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 100 Part 4.djvu/352

 100 STAT. 3207-73

PUBLIC LAW 99-570—OCT. 27, 1986

(c) PROSECUTION OF THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TORTURE AND MURDER OF D E A AGENTS.—Of the funds allocated for assistance for

• r:20 J ' •3 0^ ] i '

'- i.'

National Drug Interdiction Iniprovement Act of 1986.

Mexico for fiscal year 1987 under chapter 8 of part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291 et seq.; relating to international narcotics control), $1,000,000 shall be withheld from expenditure until the President reports to the Congress that the Government of Mexico— (1) has fully investigated the 1985 murders of Drug Enforcement Administration agent Enrique Camarena Salazar and his -iJ// pilot Alfredo Zavala Avelar; (2) has fully investigated the 1986 detention and torture of Drug Enforcement Administration agent Victor Cortez, Junior; and (3) has brought to trial and is effectively prosecuting those responsible for those murders and those responsible for that detention and torture. TITLE III—INTERDICTION

'J v < ,

SEC. 3001. SHORT TITLE.

21 USC 801 note.

This title may be cited as the "National Drug Interdiction Improvement Act of 1986".

21 USC 801 note.

SEC. 3002. FINDINGS.

'

•.

'

'

The Congress hereby finds that— w x (1) a balanced, coordinated, multifaceted strategy for combating the growing drug abuse and drug trafficking problem in the United States is essential in order to stop the flow and abuse of drugs within our borders; (2) a balanced, coordinated, multifaceted strategy for combat: f^"-. ing the narcotics drug abuse and trafficking in the United ';' States should include— (A) increased investigations of large networks of drug ' - smuggler organizations; n.. (B) source country drug eradication; (C) increased emphasis on stopping narcotics traffickers in countries through which drugs are transshipped; (D) increased emphasis on drug education programs in

the schools and workplace; ..:.• • J. (E) increased Federal Government assistance to State and t-i'; local agencies, civic groups, school systems, and officials in their efforts to combat the drug abuse and trafficking ' 'problem at the local level; and (F) increased emphasis on the interdiction of drugs and }•' i." i li vi aiH drug smugglers at the borders of the United States, in the air, at sea, and on the land; (8) funds to support the interdiction of narcotics smugglers who threaten the transport of drugs through the air, on the sea, and across the land borders of the United States should be same extent as the other elements of a comprehensive antidrug effort are emphasized; t i (4) the Department of Defense and the use of its resources should be an integral part of a comprehensive, natonal drug interdiction program; ' ' (5) the Federal Government civilian agencies engaged in drug interdiction, particularly the United States Customs Service
 * ' emphasized in the Federal Government budget process to the

�