Page:United States Reports 546.pdf/317

 546US1

106

Unit: $U11

[08-22-08 15:19:52] PAGES PGT: OPIN

WAGNON v. PRAIRIE BAND POTAWATOMI NATION Opinion of the Court

11, conﬁrms that the Nation’s interpretation of the statute before the Court of Appeals was correct. As written, the Kansas fuel tax provisions state that “the incidence of this tax is imposed on the distributor of the ﬁrst receipt of the motor fuel and such taxes shall be paid but once. Such tax shall be computed on all motor-vehicle fuels or special fuels received by each distributor, manufacturer or importer in this state and paid in the manner provided for herein. . . .” Kan. Stat. Ann. § 79–3408(c) (2003 Cum. Supp.). Under this provision, the distributor who initially receives the motor fuel is liable for payment of the fuel tax, and the distributor’s tax liability is determined by calculat­ ing the amount of fuel received by the distributor. Section 79–3410(a) (1997) conﬁrms that it is the distribu­ tor’s off-reservation receipt of the motor fuel, and not any subsequent event, that establishes tax liability. That sec­ tion provides: “[E]very distributor, manufacturer, importer, exporter or retailer of motor-vehicle fuels or special fuels, on or before the 25th day of each month, shall render to the director. . . a report certiﬁed to be true and correct showing the number of gallons of motor-vehicle fuels or special fuels received by such distributor, manufacturer, importer, exporter or retailer during the preceding cal­ endar month. . . . Every distributor, manufacturer or importer within the time herein ﬁxed for the rendering of such reports, shall compute and shall pay to the direc­ tor at the director’s ofﬁce the amount of taxes due to the state on all motor-vehicle fuels or special fuels re­ ceived by such distributor, manufacturer or importer during the preceding calendar month.” Thus, Kansas law expressly provides that a distributor’s monthly tax obligations are determined by the amount of fuel received by the distributor during the preceding month. See Kline, 297 F. Supp. 2d, at 1294 (“The distributor must