Page:United States Reports 502 OCT. TERM 1991.pdf/996

 502ord$pt2 08-08-95 19:36:00 PGT•ORDBV (Bound Volume)

ORDERS 502 U. S.

1089

February 24, 1992

granted, ante, p. 1056.] Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted. No. 91–501. Aponte, Mayor of the Municipality of Carolina, et al. v. Hiraldo-Cancel et al., ante, p. 1004. Motion of respondents for attorney’s fees denied. No. 91–860. United States Department of Commerce et al. v. Montana et al. D. C. Mont. [Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 1012.] Motion of Attorney General of Washington for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for additional time for oral argument denied. Motion of Attorney General of Massachusetts for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for additional time for oral argument denied. No. 91–1270. Richards, Governor of Texas, et al. v. Terrazas et al. Appeal from D. C. W. D. Tex. Motion of appellants to expedite consideration of the statement as to jurisdiction denied. No. 91–5771. Wade v. United States. C. A. 4th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1003.] Motion of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for additional time for oral argument denied. No. 91–6734. Neshewat v. Hagstrom et al. Ct. App. N. Y.; and No. 91–6854. Ingalls v. Roosevelt County, New Mexico, et al. Sup. Ct. N. M. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until March 16, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Stevens, dissenting. For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), I would deny the petitions for writs of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motions to proceed in forma pauperis. No. 91–6444. In re Carroll; No. 91–6578. In re Hall et al.;