Page:United States Reports 502 OCT. TERM 1991.pdf/927

 502ORD$$1I 02-10-99 16:45:48 PGT•ORD1BV (Bound Volume)

1020

OCTOBER TERM, 1991 December 16, 1991

502 U. S.

of Appeals’ unpublished opinion* cannot be squared with our harmless-error precedents, I would vacate the judgment and direct the Court of Appeals to review the sentence under the proper standard. No. 91–151. Texas v. Sloan. Ct. App. Tex., 12th Dist. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 809 S. W. 2d 234. No. 91–448. Willner v. Barr, Acting Attorney General, et al. C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 289 U. S. App. D. C. 93, 928 F. 2d 1185. No. 91–475. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Carland. C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of American Council of Life Insurance for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 935 F. 2d 1114. Rehearing Denied No. 91–5467. Jenkins v. Dugger et al., ante, p. 943. Petition for rehearing denied. No. 90–8304. Argentina v. United States Department of Justice et al., ante, p. 843; No. 91–109. Clay v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, ante, p. 861; No. 91–150. Lockhart v. Kenops, Forest Supervisor, Black Hills National Forest, United States Forest Service, et al., ante, p. 863; No. 91–5108. Street v. Jabe, Warden, ante, p. 875; No. 91–5329. Malacow v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, ante, p. 887; No. 91–5578. Housel v. Zant, Warden, ante, p. 915; No. 91–5651. Crow v. Upjohn Co. et al., ante, p. 916; and No. 91–5756. Borchers v. United States (two cases), ante, p. 928. Petitions for rehearing denied. Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions. Nonpublication must not be a convenient means to prevent review. An unpublished opinion may have a lingering effect in the Circuit and surely is as important to the parties concerned as is a published opinion.
 * The fact that the Court of Appeals’ opinion is unpublished is irrelevant.