Page:United States Reports 502 OCT. TERM 1991.pdf/308

 502us1$12J 08-21-96 15:26:34 PAGES OPINPGT

150

ARDESTANI v. INS Blackmun, J., dissenting

hope that the Court’s departure from its approach in Hudson signals no permanent change in its EAJA jurisprudence. I would hold that Ardestani is entitled to a fee award and would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.