Page:United States Reports 502 OCT. TERM 1991.pdf/1041

 502ind$$bv 09-11-95 14:43:04 PGT•INDBV (Bound Volume)

1308

INDEX

FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SUPERVISORY ACT OF 1966. District court jurisdiction—Regulatory proceedings.—District Court lacked jurisdiction to enjoin prosecution of two administrative proceedings pending against respondent—a bank holding company—when it filed for bankruptcy. Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc., p. 32. FIRST AMENDMENT. See Constitutional Law, IV; V. FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT. See Constitutional Law, III, 1. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. Exemption 6—Haitian nationals—Disclosure of unredacted interview reports.—Deletion from interview reports of names of Haitian nationals who had attempted to immigrate illegally to United States and were involuntarily returned to Haiti were authorized by FOIA Exemption 6, since their disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of returnees’ privacy. Department of State v. Ray, p. 164. FREEDOM OF SPEECH. See Constitutional Law, IV. GRIEVOUS WRONG STANDARD FOR MODIFYING DECREES. See Consent Decrees. GUILTY VERDICTS. See Constitutional Law, III, 2. HABEAS CORPUS. See Supreme Court, 5. HAITIANS. See Freedom of Information Act. HAROLD WASHINGTON PARTY. See Constitutional Law, V. HEARSAY EVIDENCE. See Constitutional Law, I. ILLINOIS. See Constitutional Law, I; V. IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT. See also Equal Access to Justice Act; Freedom of Information Act. 1. Arrest of excludable aliens—Release bond conditions.—Regulation generally requiring that release bonds for excludable aliens pending a determination of their deportability contain a condition that forbids unauthorized employment is, on its face, consistent with Attorney General’s statutory authority. INS v. National Center for Immigrants’ Rights, Inc., p. 183. 2. Deportation—Attorney General’s authority to reopen proceedings.— Attorney General did not abuse his discretion in denying a motion to reopen Doherty’s deportation proceedings either on ground that Doherty failed to adduce new evidence or on ground that he failed to satisfactorily explain his previous withdrawal of claims for withholding of deportation and asylum. INS v. Doherty, p. 314.