Page:United States Reports, Volume 209.djvu/594

 INDEX. 2. Trial; arswt o! amn*d. An interruption of the court adng defdats cottasol to maim �proper argument held in this oa to be jutifi and not a ground for tion. lb. 3. A man may sometimes be p,mid i perm whe he h brought quaess to pss, although he w not tera in perm. (Ia r 1 U. 8. 7.) Ud 8 v. iVla', 9. 16, 1883. A solicitation for funds for mpain purl made by litter in violation of [ 15 of the Civil Servic Act o! Janaary 16, 1883, c. 27, 22 Stat. 403, is ot complete until the ltter is deliared to the person from whom the eonirlbution is solicited, and ff tl letter is rcived by one within buildin or room deribed in � of th act the solicitation is in that plum and the ruder of the letter oommite t pohibited oif in t] prchibitod pta. lb. An indictment which clearly and distinctly cbarS each and every elemant of te offene intended to be cheated, iud which distinctly advis the clelant of what he is to mcot at tbe trial is sufficient; and so/ld in this ee  to an indictment for aptin ralmt prohibited by F4ki,. Act, lthouh the details of the derira by which the hates ived wsm not t out. Armoar Packi Co. v. Ua 8a, 56. While infant is to some extent entisl in the commion of crime, and without determlnln whether a shipper honestly payin s reduc[ed rate in the behe! that it is the publisld rate is liable under the statute,  that shippers who pay uch a rate with iuli knowledge of the pub lished rates, and ntend that they have & rht so to do, commit the oee prohibited by the Elkins Act, and are subject to the penalties provided therein, even though their contmtion he s. istake of law. lb. qee 0ONrs'rl'r'rOAL LAW, 2, 3, 9, asmc-ro, D 2, a. CUBA.  Oc; PaceA  Ao'r, 2. DAMAGES. qee LIUNCTION, 2. DECLARATIONS.

�