Page:United States Reports, Volume 209.djvu/539

 In re MOORE. 20 U, 8o T2 CI Jcsc dis*ent/n. wMch the plaintiff could ve brout oy  the Uni-  S Circt . e fit of mmov ven  the non-ident defendant or defen by the cond cl of  2, mincing the cse from the sta cou  the United S cuit ,  subject  the limitio of that clause t it mt  a suit with he judiction of such Ccuit , d tt it mt be removed  the pror dtfict, d therefore the t d not uthofize him or them  remove it  the Ud S ct  held in  dtfict wherein t co w not ven jction of the suit removed,  y other judiei dtfict in which the suit  not nding,  provided in  3. Plaintiff brought Ms suit in  dtfict whin the defendant cod not be sued  the Feder cou thin the meg of the . H v. Woo Am Cy, 1 Fed. Rep. 530. e pror district th the meaning of the second cl of the cond ction me either of the dtfic me "pror d$fic" by the flint section of the t, d when the third ti mqu the tition   "for the mmovsl of such suit in  Ccuit u  be held in the district where such st  ndg," it mt ve bn nmplted that the sui wod  nding in  "pror dtfict." It  plain that the entire t  not   construed  ng jurdiction by re,on of citizeMp   Circuit Court held in a State of which neither y  a citizen, but, on the contr, that it rtfic the jction  the stfict in wch one of the pi rid t the S of which he   citizen.

�