Page:United States Reports, Volume 209.djvu/529

 r of e pi who t s s  th cos  d  e fion, we the fo  [e t cla  the fion] re ' the dtfict  wch a t y  oy brecht." In t.  &c. y Cny v. MOBS, 1 U.S. , 131, it w d: "e t it  e,  defdt aH, tt   �not a ' wch jiction  found oy on e ft tt the ntrovey  twn ti of diffet S, but t it m wit t  of tt other c, w pmd t 'no cil t   bmt fo either of d , it any n, by y ofi pm or pg,  y other dtfict t t wheel he   bit,' ill c t   un t oy  the one tfict  a o1 pfi!e w he y wve and he d wve it by pleg  the mefi. "Wigout multiplng uthoti on th quaion, it  o vious that the y who in the fit'  apam d plus  the mefi waiv y fit  che ther the juiction of the u on the od tt the st  n brout in the ng dtfict. C N.  v. Man, 132 U.S. 141; F C Cny v. F, 137 U.S. 98." In Sw v.  Mni Cny, 1 U.S. , 3, a  g afar the act of 18, and in which.the defendant promptly m the quition of juriction, Mr. Jti Gray fe  t tr  thee wos: "e Qucy Ming mpany, a co,ration of Mic, havg app sc11y for the pu of ng the ob jectioa tt it could not  su  the Southern Dtfict of New York, by a fin of other S, t   no ques- tion of wver, ch   n coized whe a defendant h ap nemlly  a suit tween citins of dfferent

�