Page:United States Reports, Volume 209.djvu/507

 SCULLY v. BIRD. Argument for Appellant& SCULLY v. BIRD. �mFL FROM . CURCU? COtroT OF HE Urln S a E STERN DISTRI O MICHIGAN. No. . 8t Apl . l8.id My 4. 1  m  not e    t tw the opon of  uit  d i ifi.  ifi that the bill w diid lely  the suit w t t S thin the mei of the Eleventh Amendment d therefore not  e junction of the Fral u  such, this  ot dee whether t bill shoed have n d' ca not p tg a  for uitable lief. A it by a cit of other Sta  (min a a offir from impmrly eog a s statu, whe no cminal putiou h  m- men, ,  th c, not    tion st the S t t mg of the Elevth Ament. E fac e sta in the opon. Mr. E. T. F, for apl]an: e proMbition of the Elenth Amendment do not apply where a t  brought ast defendan who, claiming  t  offi of the Sta, d under color of a statu which  vaBd and mtitution, but wronully nired by em, comet, or than  comet, acts of ong or inju  the gh d proy of the plaintiff, or make such - minimti of the tu an i]]e buen and exaction upon the plY.  F. . Pro. (11 ed.),  5, Su. 4; R v. Fs'  & Tt Co., IU. S. 388. N where  didual is su in to for some act injurio  oer  rd  on or propey, to which his delete  that he  ac under the oe of the govement. In  c] of , the defendant is not sued , or becau he M, the offir of the govement, but  an individual, and the  is not o of juiction cause he se authoty  ch offir. To ke out Ms defer, he m show that

�