Page:United States Reports, Volume 209.djvu/306

 0 OTOB.R TI.M, 1907. Ksm_, 72;  v. ,   773.  in for deion  : o, e n- non  he p wa eHow  e fo of t  at work on e b d the t of metion; other, the qumfion of nn on  of the defent; d s t, nt6bu n. th mfemn  e t, it mt  me  d t e p-  wms n employ on a lmofive, md  work  M a  deent from tt of the employ& en-  M the mction of e bd.   not s  for the apportion of the dte of fellowlet. It wod  t doctrine  f  hold tMt one employ mgn d e in the movement of s tn wm  fellow- t th e su6ndent of mintruction d the fo  of a b6d , th of whom'were pt d e in sui d ti the work on e b6d. Th tr employ& mpn the pci in  enly f- femnt ne of emploent from tMt in wMch the pntiff m e, were d a five duty of the r  pmde a fe d suible p d stct in d un wch i employ& were  do their work--Un P  Co. v. O'B, 161 U.S. 1, d  ci in the opiond in dir tt tive duty. ey d not he we the pnfiv of the defendt. The tion,  f  tt work w' nm, w the tion of the d fennt. With refen  the nd quition, tt of negn on the part of the defent, it mt  p tt t largely a question of ft, d a quition of ft is subt  the decision of a ju. Nottnding the able ment of ue] for defendant in endvofi  show tt the d fendant did everything tt prudence requir for the p of making the bridge fe, we are not tisfi tt the mony is so convincing in th reset   jtify  in tting ide the verdict of the jury, approved  it w by the t

�