Page:Turkey, the great powers, and the Bagdad Railway.djvu/375

 *[Footnote: newspaper accounts which I have used are those of ''The New York Times, The Times (London), The Manchester Guardian'', The World (New York), and the Christian Science Monitor (Boston). For reports and editorial comment in weekly periodicals I have consulted The Near East, L'Europe Nouvelle, ''Journal des Débats, The New Statesman (London), The Nation'' (New York). The following magazine articles have proved useful: "The Lausanne Conference," in Current History, Volume XVII (1923), pp. 531-537, 743-748, 929-930; Saint-Brice, "De la Ruhr à Lausanne," in Correspondance d'Orient (Paris), February, 1923; "The Oriental Labyrinth at Lausanne," in the Literary Digest, April 21, 1923, pp. 19-20; H. Froidevaux, "Les négociations de Lausanne et leur suspension," in L'Asie Française, 33 year, No. 208 (Paris, 1923), pp. 8-10; J. C. Powell, "Italy at Lausanne," in The New Statesman, Volume XX (1922), pp. 291-292; A. J. Toynbee, "The New Status of Turkey," in the ''Contemporary Review, Volume 123 (1923), pp. 281-289; P. Bruneau, "La question de Mossoul," in L'Europe Nouvelle'', February 3, 1923, pp. 138-140. For some of my information regarding the Lausanne Conference I am indebted to Djavid Bey.]*