Page:Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, Volume 10.djvu/67

 {| width="100%" P. cucullata to Leucadendros, its flowers being very similar to those of Protea hirta. As to his application of this name to P. conocarpa, it could only proceed from his total ignorance of its fructification; for, as he has figured a nearly related species, P. hypophylla, under the very different name of Thymelea, &c., it is reasonable to conclude, that had he seen the flower of P. conocarpa he would have given it the same generic name. This P. conocarpa however, of which it may truly be said he know nothing, and concerning which at least no information is to be derived from his works, is the only species of the three which belongs to Mr. Salisbury's genus Leucadendron.
 * width="10%" align="left" |
 * width="80%" align="center" | Mr., on the Proteaceae of Jussieu.
 * width="10%" align="right" | 45
 * }
 * }

But the original Leucadendros of Herman, of Plukenet, and of Linnæus himself, is Protea argentea, the only plant of the family to which the name can properly be applied; to this therefore I have assigned it in the following arrangement.

Before proceeding to this arrangement, I am happy in having an opportunity of acknowledging that assistance which has so liberally been afforded me.

To the invaluable Herbarium and Library of Sir Joseph Banks I have on this, as on all other occasions, enjoyed the freest access; an advantage which has been greatly enhanced by the opportunity it has given me of consulting my friend Mr. Dryander, both as to the formation of genera and respecting synonyms, on which point his sound judgment and unrivalled erudition so well enable him to decide.

To Dr. Smith I am indebted for the permission of inspecting the Linnæan Collection, and for the most friendly and satisfactory answers to the queries on this subject which he allowed me to put to him.

Mr. Lambert, whose Herbarium in this tribe is only surpassed