Page:Toleration and other essays.djvu/26

2 general public is heard, and each fears for himself. They see that no man's life is safe before a court that has been set up to guard the welfare of citizens, and every voice is raised in a demand of  vengeance.

In this strange incident we have to deal with religion, suicide, and parricide. The question was, Whether a father and mother had strangled their  son to please God, a brother had strangled his  brother, and a friend had strangled his friend; or  whether the judges had incurred the reproach of  breaking on the wheel an innocent father, or of  sparing a guilty mother, brother, and friend.

Jean Calas, a man of sixty-eight years, had been engaged in commerce at Toulouse for more than forty years, and was recognised by all who knew  him as a good father. He was a Protestant, as were also his wife and family, except one  son, who had abjured the heresy, and was in  receipt of a small allowance from his father. He seemed to be so far removed from the absurd fanaticism that breaks the bonds of society that he had  approved the conversion of his son [Louis Calas],  and had had in his service for thirty years a zealous  Catholic woman, who had reared all his children.

One of the sons of Jean Calas, named Marc Antoine, was a man of letters. He was regarded as of a restless, sombre, and violent character. This young man, failing to enter the commercial world,  for which he was unfitted, or the legal world, because he could not obtain the necessary certificate  that he was a Catholic, determined to end his life,  and informed a friend of his intention. He