Page:Title 3 CFR 2007 Compilation.djvu/262

 EO 13447 Title 3--The President (II) mental disease or defect that renders the person unable to understand the nature of the sexual conduct at issue; (ii) physically declining participation in the sexual conduct at issue; or (ili) physically communicating unwillingness to engage in the sexual conduct at issue. (15) Mistake of fact as to consent. The term "mistake of fact as to consent" means the accused he\177d, as a result of ignorance or mistake, an incorrect belief that the other person engaging in the sexual conduct consented. The ignorance or mistake must have existed in the mind of the accused and must have been reasonable under all the circumstances. To be reasonable, the ignorance or mistake must have been based on information, or lack of it, that would indicate to a reasonable person that the other person consented. Additionally, the ignorance or mistake cannot be based on the negligent failure to discover the true facts. Negligence is the absence of due care. Due care is what a reasonably careful person would do under the same or similar circumstances. The accused's state of intoxication, if any, at the time of the offense is not relevant to mistake of fact. A mistaken belief that the other person consented must be that which a reasonably careful, ordinary, prudent, sober adult would have had under the circumstances at the time of the offense. (16) Affirmative defense. The term "affirmative defense" means any special defense that, although not denying that the accused committed the objective acts constituting the offense charged, denies, wholly, or partially, criminal responsibility for those acts. The accused has the burden of proving the affirmative defense by a preponderance of evidence. After the defense meets this burden, the prosecution shall have the burden of proving 262

�