Page:The copyright act, 1911, annotated.djvu/47

 Rights. *35

one advertisement in which the book was not described § 2 (1) (iv).

as intended for the use of schools, the owner of any copy-

right work from which any i^assage had been taken Avould be entitled to an injunction, delivery up of copies, and damages. The copies having become infringing copies, and consequently the proiDerty of the OAvner of the copy- right, would not again become lawful copies by subsecj[ucnt compliance with the terms of the sub-section.

(v) The publication in a newspaper of a report § 2 (i) (v). of a lecture (/) delivered in public (^), unless the report is prohibited by con- spicuous written or printed notice affixed before and maintained during the lecture at or about the main entrance of the Ijuilding in which the lecture is given, and, except whilst the building is being- used for ]3ublic worship, in a position near the lecturer ; but nothing in this paragraph shall affect the provisions in paragraph (i) as to newspaper sum- maries :

There is no liberty of dealing A\itli a lecture under this Privilege does paragraph unless it is delivered in public. Lectures, Uniyei!^i"[ ^^j^. therefore, which arc delivered by a professor in a uni- other lectures versity (^), or a lecturer in a college, such as the Work- not delivered ing Men's College (i), cannoit be reported without the con- '" P"^lic, sent of the lecturer. A lecture is delivered in public whei'e members of the public are admitted as such. A lecturer may deliver a lecture to an audience each member of which, although coming as one of the general public,

��(/) Sect. 35 (1) ("Lecture").

{(j) Sect. 35 (2).

[h) Caird v. Sime (1887), 12 A. C. 326 ; Abcriietlvix. Hntchimon (1825), 3L. J. (O. S.) Ch. 209.

(i) Nicola V. /»7/rtff« (1884), 2G Ch. D. 371. See also Duck v. Bates (1884). 13 Q. B. D. 843 ; Glomlley. Scliy Pohjscopc Co. (1911), The Times, July 20.

d2

�� �