Page:The World's Famous Orations Volume 9.djvu/62

 THE WORLD'S FAMOUS ORATIONS No doubt, sir, a great majority of the people J of New England conscientiously believed the ^^embargo law of 1807 unconstitutional; as con- ^ientiously, certainly, as the people of South Carolina hold that opinion of the tariff. They reasoned thus: Congress has power to regulate commerce ; but here is a law, they said, stopping all commerce, and stopping it indefinitely. The law is perpetual ; that is, it is not limited in point of time, and must of course continue until it shall be repealed by some other law. It is per^ petual, therefore, as the law against treason or murder. Now, is this regulating commerce or destroying it? Is it guiding, controlling, giving the rule to commerce, as a subsisting thing, or is it putting an end to it altogether? Nothing is more certain than that a majority in New England deemed this law a violation of the Constitution. The very case required by the gentleman to justify State interference had then arisen. Massachusetts believed this law to be ''a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of a power not granted by the Consti- tution.'' Deliberate it was, for it was long continued; palpable she thought it, as no words in the Constitution gave the power, and only a construction, in her opinion most violent, raised it; dangerous it was, since it threatened titter ruin to her most important interests. Here, then, was a Carolina case. How did Massachusetts deal with it? It was, as she thought, a plain, manifest, palpable violation of 52