Page:The Supreme Court in United States History vol 1.djvu/253

Rh ensued in the Senate, February 3, 1803, in which the question of the power of the Court to pass on the validity of an Act of Congress was again argued, and questioned by some of the Southern Republicans.^ " Ought we to go to the Courts and ask them whether we have done our duty or whether we have violated the Constitution?'* asked Senator Jackson of Georgia. Congressman James Ross of Pennsylvania supported the power of the Judiciary in a remarkably able and elaborate speech, in which he said : "Either the law or the Constitution is a nullity. K the new doctrines be true, the law must prevail. K so, why provide any prohibitions or exceptions in a Constitution, and why ask any solemn Judge to support it? The Court when pressed for judgment must declare which shall prevail ; and if they do their duty, they will certainly say that a law at variance with the Constitution is utterly void ; it is made without authority and cannot be executed. By doing so, the Courts do not control or prostrate the just authority of Congress. It is the will of the people expressed in the Constitution which controls them." Ross also pointed out the singular fact that hitherto the chief complaint of the Anti-Federalists had been that the Federalist Judges had, in the various cases coming before them under the much-attacked Alien and Sedition laws, upheld the validity of those laws. But if the Court had no power to deny their validity, with what just reason could their action in sustaining the criminal prosecutions under these laws be assailed? Hence, Ross presented to the present opponents of the Court

ing the Judges of all power derived under the Act repealed. The office still remains, which he holds to be a mere capacity, without a new appointment, to receive and exercise any new judicial powers which the Legislature may confer. It has been considered here that the most advisable course for the Circuit Courts to pursue will be, at the end of the ensueing session to adjourn generally, and to leave what remains to be done to the Supreme Court" Hamilton Papert M8S,

1 7tk Cong., Sd SesM., 51 et »eq.