Page:The Supreme Court in United States History vol 1.djvu/234

206 Congress will not be deterred from its duty and that the law will be repealed. No doubt, some struggle will be made at the next sitting of the Supreme Court in this city to effect something under color of law, which may have a tendency to raise the droopmg spirits of the opposition party — indeed, I am told that the matter was at first proposed by those behind the curtain not to bring it forward so soon, but the rumours that had been spread of the President's intention not to ape the monarchical forms of speechifying induced them to precipitate the business in the last Term." ^ If the piupose of the Federalists in instituting the Marbury Case had been such as was intimated in this letter, it utterly failed ; for the Republican party had no intention of being deterred from abolishing the Federalist Judiciary legislation. For two months there ensued a prolonged and heated debate in Congress.* Ostensibly there were three leading points of discussion — first, the necessity for any increase in the number of Federal Judges, in view of the alleged decrease in business in the Federal Courts; second, the desirability of the performance of Circuit Court duty by the Supreme Court Judges ; and third, the constitutionality of the proposed legislation. The Federalist attack was chiefly based on the proposition that a statute abolishing existing Courts would violate the constitutional pro

^ThiB reference was to the fact that President Jefferson in his First Annual Address to Congress in December, 1801, departed from the precedent set by Wash- ington and Adams of delivering his address in person before Congress and sent in a written message through his Secretary.

in the House, Feb. 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27, March 1, 8. For detaUed account of this debate, see Mar$kaU, III, 50, 91, and for lively and interesting contemporary account, not cited in the above work, see letters from Washington correspondents in United States Gazette, New York Evening Poet, New York Spsetator, WaehingUm Federalist, Salem Gazette, Salem Register, passim, Jan.-March, 1802; Connecticut Courant, Feb. 22, 1802; Farmer's Weekly Museum, March 16^ 1802. See also interesting article in the National Aegis (Worcester, Mass.), Dec. 16» 1801» on the Judiciary system, and article quoted from Conneoticui QasuUe,
 * 7th Cong,, IH 8e$9., see debate in the Senate, Jan. 6, 8, 18, 15, Feb. 2, 8, 1802;