Page:The Peerage, Baronetage and Knightage of the British Empire Part 1.djvu/18

vi Notwithstanding the proverbial inveteracy of error, it is believed that sone real work has here been accomplished by making the Baronetage more select and by correcting many of the abuses in coat armour. It may very properly be urged that this is the prerogative of the Crown, through its duly appointed officers, rather than the business of an individual; but it is greatly to be deplored that not only do Crown officials continue indirectly to dub men Baronets who have no right whatever to the title, but also that the editors of genealogical books persist—why I know not—in advertising these falsities as genuine. An attempt was made a century ago to remedy the blot, but it proved unsuccessful; still I believe that favourable results would ensue from a renewed effort on the part of the Crown to set this part of its house in order, were it only by rendering it imperative that successors, as they inherit doubtful honours, should prove their claim to the title they assume.

I am much gratified that there have been so many responses to my application for corrections and additions to the work, which I hope I may continue to receive, and that facts as they occur may be communicated to me by post.

I trust that by this means each successive edition will approach nearer the standard at which I have aimed, and will also be more in conformity with the wishes of the families whose histories are here set out. JOSEPH FOSTER.