Page:The New International Encyclopædia 1st ed. v. 13.djvu/31

MANUFACTURERS. most prominently connected are the reform of the patent law and of the consular and postal services. The association has placed itself on record as not being opposed to labor organizations as such, but maintains that employers must be free to employ their working people without interference on the part of individual organizations and that they must be unmolested in the management of their business and in the use of any methods or systems of pay which are equitable. The association provided for the organization of separate defense associations in the different lines of industry it represents. Provision was further made for the federation of these affiliated protected associations into a “permanent central organization that will create a clearinghouse for ideas and provide means for cooperation on matters of common interest.” The association has evidently entered upon a programme of positive opposition to trade unionism. The association had, in 1903, more than 1900 members, and claimed that, measured by capital invested, workmen employed, or products manufactured, it constitutes the largest trade body in the world. The association publishes the American Trade Index and the Confidential Bulletin of Inquiries from Foreign Buyers; its organ is American Industries, published semi-monthly at New York.  MANUFACTURES (ML. manufactura, from Lat. manufactus, manu factus, made by hand, from manu, abl. sg. of manus, hand, and factus, p.p. of facere, to make). In a broad sense of the term, manufactures are such forms of industry as elaborate for economic use materials which are themselves the product of industry. Manufactures are thus distinguished from extractive industry, which procures wealth from nature in its primary forms. In practice it is difficult to draw a hard and fast line between these two types of industry, since many commodities which are commonly classed as raw materials have been subject to one or more elaborative processes, as, for example, raw cotton, raw sugar, pig iron. The practice of American statisticians is to class with extractive industry processes which are directly connected with the exploitation of natural products. Butter and cheese which are made on the farm are treated as agricultural products; when produced in factories distinct from the farm they are classed with manufactures. A product in its earliest merchantable form may then be classed with raw materials; when subjected to further processes of elaboration it becomes a manufactured commodity. For the technical legal distinction in this matter, see .

Again, many commodities undergo minor changes incidental to consumption. The preparation of food may be cited as a case in point. Such processes are not usually placed under manufactures. If the preparation of food is carried on in separate establishments with a view to supplying a market, it will fall under the head of manufactures. This distinction is obviously difficult to make in practice. The twelfth census of the United States excludes from manufactures proper most forms of order production, confining the term to production of standard commodities for a general market. From a theoretical point of view, however, it is better to include under manufactures all processes of elaboration of merchantable materials into commodities primarily designed for sale.

In this sense of the term manufactures presuppose a considerably developed economic life. They did not exist when each household produced exclusively for its own consumption. In Western Europe they were first carried on under the (q.v.). forming, however, but an insignificant part of the economic life. With the rise of capital in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, manufactures were carried on more extensively under the domestic system. The capitalist-merchant put out materials to be worked up at home by workmen whose chief occupation was usually agriculture. This form of manufacture still exists in America and England; it is widely practiced in France, Germany, and Russia; and in some European districts, notably in Norway, it is the prevalent form.

In the more advanced nations domestic manufacture has been largely supplanted by the (q.v.). The extension of the market in early modern times, requiring a vastly increased production of goods of standard kinds, led first to excessive division of labor and later to the invention of machinery. The first industries to respond to these influences were the textile and the iron industries as discussed in detail under the heads of and.

. At the end of the colonial period manufacturing industry in America was of slight importance. The principal salable articles were raw materials, such as the products of the forests. Each household provided itself with the chief commodities for consumption. In New England, however, the manufacture of rum was extensive, and the production of hats, coarse cloth, and nails was carried on under the domestic system of industry. The total value of the manufactures of America at the time of the adoption of the Constitution has been estimated at $20,000,000; but this includes much domestic production for home consumption.

Machine production scarcely existed before 1790. In that year a British mechanic, Slater, set up spinning machinery in Rhode Island. In 1794 Whitney invented the cotton gin, thus assuring a supply of raw materials for the new cotton manufacture. By 1810 machinery had been generally introduced in textile manufacture, although large quantities of goods were still produced under the older system. The value of textiles produced in that year was estimated at about $40,000,000.

The iron manufacture developed more slowly. Machinery of improved types was introduced in the first and second decades of the nineteenth century, but the greater part of the production and manufacture was carried on in a primitive fashion, until the fifth decade of the century, when anthracite began to be substituted for charcoal in smelting. From that time increase was rapid, as will be seen in the statistics given under. The value of the manufactures of the United States for the year 1810 was estimated by Tench Coxe to be $198,613,471. In 1820 the value of manufactures had risen to $268,000,000. The following table, taken from the Twelfth Census, Manufactures, part i., gives the essential facts as to the development of manufactures from 1850: