Page:The New Far East (1906).djvu/93

74 that it was the desire of the Russian Minister to leave Korea, and asked the opinion of the Japanese Minister on the subject. The Japanese Minister replied that if the Russian Minister would withdraw in a peaceful manner, taking with him his staff and the legation guard, he would be fully protected by Japanese troops. So he withdrew of his own free will on the twelfth of the same month, and an escort of Japanese soldiers was furnished for him as far as Chemul-po. The Russian allegation that the Japanese Government forwarded a summons through the French representative in Korea to the Russian Minister to leave Korea is, therefore, not true. In this connection it may be remarked that the Russian consul at Fusan remained at his post as late as February 28 last. It is reported that he was compelled to stay so long owing to the absence of instructions which the Russian Minister apparently did not think of giving to the consul before his own departure from Seoul. When it was known that the necessary instructions had at last reached the Russian consul, and that he desired to leave Fusan as soon as possible, the Japanese consul at the same port offered him every facility for his departure, and his passage to Shanghai via Japan was arranged by the Japanese consul."

To this the Russian Government retorted on March 12th, as follows:

"Japan's argument that she was justified in landing troops in Korea before the declaration of war, because she had Korea's permission, and also that these troops arrived in Korea after 'the existence of a state of war,' is without value, as Korea in January promulgated her neutrality to the Powers, which received it warmly. Great Britain even officially conveying expressions of gratitude to the Korean Government. Therefore, no state of war gave the Japanese the right to violate her neutrality by landing troops in her territory. Even the consent of Korea, though extorted by the Japanese, is without force, from the fact that the despatch of troops was not only before the war, but before the breaking off of diplomatic relations, as clearly established and indeed acknowledged by the Japanese themselves.

"'Japan's contention in defence of the attack upon the Russian ships at Chemul-po, that the port was not neutral on February 9, is false again, because Korea had proclaimed her neutrality." "'Japan's denial of malicious interference with the transmission of Russian telegrams over the Danish cable cannot be sustained. A telegram to Baron Rosen (then Russian Minister to Japan) at"