Page:The Nestorians and their rituals, volume 2.djvu/426

398 About one hundred years after this a dispute arose between Cyril Patriarch of Alexandria, and Mar Nestorius Patriarch of Byzantium, respecting the Incarnate Word. In the confession of the Trinity all Christians agree, for all receive the Nicene Creed, which creed confesses that the Trinity is co-equal in essence, dignity, power and will; and all confess of that He is perfect  and perfect Man, being fully persuaded thereof by the declarations of the Gospels, of Saint Paul, and of the 318 Fathers. The dispute which now arose respected the manner of the Union, and the words used to express it. Cyril maintained that we ought to call the Virgin "Mother of ," and wrote twelve Sentences excommunicating all who should, in any way, draw a distinction between the divinity and humanity of after the union. Nestorius replied to these Sentences, and showed that they were erroneous, and with respect to the appellation "Mother of ," he argued that it did not exist either in the writings of the Prophets or Apostles. The Prophets prophesied of to come, and the Apostles preached of that same, predicted by the Prophets as coming into the world, that this was He Who was born of Mary. Now, were we to use the expression "Mother of Man'" [sic] only, we should be like Paul of Samosata, and Photinus of Galatia, who said of our Lord that He was but a mere man like one of the prophets, and on this account they were excommunicated; so if we use the bare expression "Mother of ," we become like and, who say that  did not take a body from Mary; but that His life and actions were in appearance only and not real, and on that account they also were excommunicated. But we call the Virgin "Mother of ," the name used by Prophets and Apostles, and which denotes the union generally. Cyril, in the Sentences which he drew up, and in which he excommunicated all who shall distinguish between the divinity and humanity of, virtually excommunicates the Holy Scriptures, since the Apostles and Prophets do distinguish between the natures of the Person respecting Whom the dispute is, and from these the holy Fathers learnt to confess of , that He is perfect and perfect Man, the Likeness of  and the likeness of a servant, the Son of David and the  of the Highest, flesh and Word.