Page:The Journal of Classical and Sacred Philology, Volume 1, 1854.djvu/134

 124 Journal of Philology, to be the most correct, aVe'|Xi7rov [tuv npo]a((rdai J riva t[ovto>] yov. Col. 44, 1. 18. The form rjpyd(cTo is probably due to the scribe. The value of the testimony of the inscriptions referred to by S. must depend on their date. That containing such a word as e&pyrjaaro (No. 456) is surely worthless in determining the form which Hyperides would have used. Col. 44, 1. 25. B. tit [irpoo-obojv. S. better (l, this mark being frequently added to fill up the line. This seems to be the correct reading. Indeed ivtp- yovvrat, in the sense required here, is not tenable. If tUr is omitted, we should do well to read at nporepov eVcXeXfi/^eW with Cobet. See note, col. 3, 1. 10. Col. 45, 1. 25. B. tovs ocfXoyfT*]. This however is hardly the sense required. S. tovs *x ovTas > which C. receives, though the MS. has evidently k not x- Schneidewin himself wavers between this and eicnjptvovs, which seems too long for the space. Kayser, tovs hm sc. cpyaop,evovs. Perhaps rovs (KtlOev may stand. Col. 48, 1. 20. ppaxl> de Tt iVo>!/. S. accepts Cobet's correc- tion, ppaxi> 8' crt. C. refers to Lycurgus, 146. But en can be dispensed with, (cf. Demosth. c. Aristocr. p. 691), and n seems to be required with /Spa^v. Since writing the above, we have heard that Mr Babington has recovered two or three brief fragments of Hyperides among the miscellaneous scraps of papyri purchased from the Arabs by Mr Arden. They will doubtless appear in the edition of the extant remains of Hyperides, which we understand Mr Babington is preparing. J. B. L.