Page:The Journal of Classical and Sacred Philology, Volume 1, 1854.djvu/128

 118 Journal of Philology. Col. 3, 1. 16. (v aU. S. wishes to refer this to an antecedent emaroXals contained in sense in anearaXav yp. At the same time he suggests a doubt as to the correctness of the text. But the cto-ayycXta would probably be headed with the accuser's name, so that the words AvKovpyos Xy would be taken from it. Mr B.'s inverted commas seem to be misplaced. Col. 3, 1. 26. irri<Tia<rji. S. irt)<ruiai, in order to avoid the sudden change of mood. The MS. reading however is supported by Plat. Tim. p. 18 b (quoted in the grammars), and by analo- gous cases of the juxtaposition of different moods. See Paley on iEsch. Choeph. 80. Col. 4, 1. 3. [tot*] t}k<ov eXtyov. B. an KaOrjKw? S. Hyperides would rather have written KareXdcov. Col. 4, 1. 13. B. [fyXaxrai]. Patakis (ap. S. in Philol.) yv&vtu. Col. 5, 1. 26. B. [avajyofievos. But this can scarcely be the reading, whether in its technical sense or otherwise. S. atrayxo- ncvos, which is not in the MS. C. F. Hermann irviyopevos. Perhaps the letter read y is a r, of which part of the horizontal stroke has disappeared, and the word was rmrropevos. Mr Shilleto makes the same suggestion with regard to the letter, but reads o-cparro- fitvos. Cf. col. 6, 1. 3. Col. 6, 1. 3. Mr Shilleto Suggests flpr)K[tvai ; rts ov] | kclv one- Col. 6, 1. 5. B. [YA dc Kf<]a|Aatoi/, air[o rtov oXiycov] | Ka p.iKpa>[v tovtcov v al<rxp<* v Kai p-iap&v tovtcov <av elirov. Here he confessedly de- parts from the MS., nor can the words well bear the sense which he assigns to them : " post ilia tarn fceda et impudenter dicta." Kayser proposes t6 8 Kc<paaiov' a. rrep tovto)V Kai piKpw nporcpov urrov' (Is tovto k. r.X. But we should have expected 6. It would be better to read ro dc k., anb roureav, & Kat piKpy 7rp6rtpov tlnov. But even here oXi'yw sounds more natural. Col. 6, 1. 22. Kai Tavra [6o(t]|ft av vp'iv 'HQxncX^r] | (civos 6 pai- v[6]p.tvos TTotrja-ai [fi] | MapyiTijs 6 iravr[<ov] dfttXrtpaTaTos. Thus the passage will stand if we read 'HpaKXfjs with B. (in the Addenda), and fi with S. Schneidewin proposes 7 Atas for 'HpaKXrjs, but it is difficult to see what is gained thereby. Nor does there seem to be any great objection to 'HpaKKfjs if we distinguish between Her- cules as a character in a drama, and as an object of Athenian worship. That the former is meant here, we may collect from