Page:The Green Bag (1889–1914), Volume 23.pdf/78

 The Green Bag

56

Chief Justice White, however, being intended. "It may be remembered by some," it says, "that when the name of

tice for a suﬂicient length of time to enable the Executive to determine his ﬁtness for the oﬂice of Chief Justice.

Chief Justice Fuller was under considera

Chief Justice White's exalted con ception of the duties of his high oﬁice is illustrated by a story told by the Richmond Times-Dispatch. “A delega tion of Atlanta citizens called on Chief Justice White at ten o'clock in the morn

tion by President Cleveland for the nomination,

the

Associate

Justices

strongly urged upon him the promotion of Justice Field to the place of Chief Justice; this the President declined to

do upon the ground that if the Asso ciate Justices could look to such advance ment, the expectation might lead to mutual jealousies and possible intrigue. The course followed by President Taft in the case of Justice White is in conﬂict with settled custom and tradition, and, should it be regarded in future as a precedent, might lead to most unfor tunate results." Senator Heyburn was the only mem

ber who opposed the conﬁrmation of Mr. Chief Justice White when the ap pointment was presented to the Senate,

and he opposed it on the ground that selection of one of the Associate Jus tices was contrary both to precedent and

to policy.

Eventually he surrendered

ing, without notifying him. Luckily for them, he was at home and received the delegation cordially in his study. The

object of the delegation was to invite the new head of the nation's most august tri bunal to speak in Atlanta within a few weeks. The Chief Justice expressed his appreciation of the invitation, but made

it evident from the outset that he could not accept it. To show that he was sin cere in his declination, he exhibited some of his work to the visitors, saying: ‘I want all of you to realize and appreciate what none of you and very few lawyers appre ciate.’ "He crossed the room and pointed

to a pile of paper-back books, placed by the side of his desk chair.

There

with good grace, voting with the others

were two huge piles of books three or

so as to make the conﬁrmation unani mous. On the question of the wisdom of this precedent, the sentiment of by far the greater part of the legal profession is probably voiced by the National Car poration Reporter, in its editorial obser

four feet high—some thin, some thick—

we have heard this week, and it is only

Thursday now. There will be others. They must be read. They must be

vation:-— While it is true that the Chief Justice of the United States has no duties that are not shared by his associates, and has no greater share than they in shaping the judicial history of the coun try, the mere name gives him a conspicuousness which he would not have if he were a mere pre siding ofﬁcer at meetings of the court, elected as the presiding justice in many other appellate courts are, by his associates.

twenty or thirty of them in all. Point ing to this heap Chief Justice White said: ‘That, gentlemen, is why it is impossible for me to leave Washington. Those books represent the records in the cases

studied. I went to bed at one this mom ing, and I arose again at six. I have been working on these records. That

is the sort of life I have led for seven teen years on the bench.’" A man of great physical stature and strength, the new Chief Justice, at the

For this reason,

bench, and the best assurance of such eminence

age of sixty-ﬁve, keeps his working powers at their maximum efliciency not

would be capable services as an Associate Jus

only by reducing his hours of rest but

he should, if possible, be the ablest man on the