Page:The Green Bag (1889–1914), Volume 22.pdf/710

 676

The Green Bag

before a jury as a snowstorm would have in Hades," responded the lawyer dis gustedly. “I don't want to go into

to the jury.

court and make a ﬁzzle of it, if you do.

the entire Slabtown community was

You'd better confess up and end this thing. Take your medicine now like a. man, and it won’t be so bad. They're all against you. You haven't got a soul to help you but me. Be square with

against the vagabond. But the trial was not going to end right away. The court became irritated

convinced of the accused's guilt, and made this opinion clearly apparent

It became clear, too, that

by the attorney's persistent and pro longed cross-examination. Jim Johnson

me anyway.”

calmly continued his desperate ﬁght

But the prisoner obstinately refused to plead guilty, even if deserted by his

and gradually gained the sympathy of at least part of the jury.

attorney. “Well, then, I can't drop it. If I could, I would. I'll make the best

The trial dragged through the day, the following Monday, and part of Tuesday before the arguments to the jury were closed.

ﬁght I can, and they'll at least ﬁnd me on the job. By the way, Amos," slyly continued the lawyer, "you might

The charge of the court fully reviewed the facts as well as the law, and could

as well tell me where that eleven dollars is. That'll help some."

leave no doubt of the court's opinion on the question of guilt. This was rather

But Amos refused to bite. "I tell you I never took it. Honest to God! I haven't got any money."

astonishing to the young lawyer, who knew that in the state courts

So the lawyer prepared as best he

could to ﬁght a hopeless case. He became haunted with the idea that his obstinate client might possibly be innocent. He determined to act on that theory and battle with all his might.

The fact too, that the accused

was wholly abandoned by his acquaint ances, and that only an old unknowing mother still had faith in him, appealed

to his sympathies.

the judge always carefully refrained from indicating an opinion as to guilt or innocence. The next morning the jury was still out. Before noon the jury reported a hopeless disagreement. They were sent

back with the suggestion that there was nothing to disagree about, and they must agree. They reported again later in the day that they would never agree no matter how long out.

The court ﬁnally discharged the jury It was the case of Sixty-ﬁve Million People v. A. Vagabond, indicted burglar. The trial duly commenced Saturday morning. The presiding federal judge was from abroad taking the place of the regular sitting judge. He was anxious to rush matters and get away that day. But lawyer Jim Johnson was not going

to be hurried. He had enlisted for a battle and not for a skirmish. It is needless to go into detail.

The

federal judge evidently soon became

and angrily ordered the case to be

immediately retried before a new jury. This was extraordinary and most unusual.

The newspapers had printed

full accounts of the ﬁrst trial.

Most of

the remaining jury panel had been in and about the court room listening to

and discussing the ﬁrst trial. It seemed impossible to get an impartial jury at this term.

But Jim Johnson protested in vain. The court was now ﬁrmly convinced