Page:The Green Bag (1889–1914), Volume 22.pdf/354

 The Green Bag

332

deemed by the expounders of the law to be included among the things con tracted for. To say that such an appli cation of legal principles is upheld by the

“vested

interest"

theory,

is

to

poorly beg the question and beggar the most time-haggard examples of false analogy. The law cannot afford to lend its forces to aid the laity in deceiving them selves with the belief that they are thus “beating the corporations,” for every

incontestible policies came so fully into use, and the courts do not take a stand to

discourage

self-destruction,

it

is

likely that some company will, in the not distant future, blaze a path into a new ﬁeld of business by refusing to pay suicide policies, holding itself out

as the honest policy-holders’ company

case of suicide which is saddled upon

and giving reduced premiums on account of the elimination of those who are un equal to a Napoleonic facing of destiny. No person should have, or be allowed to transmit to another, an enforcible

the exchequer of the insurance com

right based upon an act as immemorially

panies has a direct tendency to make

condemned by both branches of our law as is self-destruction. And no state should lend its aid to enforce a liability which accrued solely by a wrongful depletion of its powers as a

insurance more costly to those who prefer to die sane. If suicide continues to increase among policy holders as rapidly as many insur ance ofﬁcers assure us it has since

state.

Oratory and the Lawyer By E. CONNOR HALL

I1‘ is the fashion

nowadays

with

many lawyers and journals to cast ridicule upon oratory, not merely upon particular specimens but upon oratory as an art, and to deprecate its usefulness to the lawyer. Part of this hostility can be ascribed to the human disposition to kick the under dog.

For it cannot be denied that the power of oratory as a weapon of popular warfare has greatly decreased within the last generation. This has been brought about by a variety of causes. First of all, is the increased distribution of the newspaper. The daily paper, by its wide dissemination of information of all sorts, has rendered the reader less hungry for oratorical discussion, and has, at the same time, afforded to him wishing to present any matter to the public an audience more numerous

than the fame of any orator could collect or any human voice reach.

Another cause is to be found in the absence in our time of any of those overshadowing national questions. such as produced Demosthenes and Cicero

in the expiring days of Grecian and Roman freedom; Burke, the Pitts, Fox, Sheridan and Erskine, in the morning

of the modern British Empire; the Adamses, Madison and Randolph in the revolutionary, and Webster, Clay,

Calhoun,

and

Hayne

in the

ante

bellum period in our own country. Orators are subject to that law which operates alike upon all, and will permit

nothing to ripen into perfect develop ment until the conditions of the times have created a need for it. Great

crises are the breeding times for orators, and as we have had none of supreme