Page:The Green Bag (1889–1914), Volume 22.pdf/172

 156

The Green Bag

and his commission issued. It must have been with no little satisfaction that the old soldier remarked at the inaugura tion of Van Buren, “There is my de feated Minister to England sworn in as

President of the United States by my defeated judge of the Supreme Court." He had now obtained a position as the

had removed the deposits. But his predecessors, Ellsworth and Marshall, largely owed their advancement to effective service in the interests of the Federalists,while Salmon Portland Chase, his immediate successor and one of the chieftians of his party, went from the Secretaryship of the Treasury to the

head of a department to which Webster

bench.

and Bryce refer as "the most powerful

ther comment these attacks as the last echoes of party strife. Clay on his part recanted and generously gave his un qualiﬁed approval of the administration of the Chief Justice. Webster, always more temperate in comment, cordially recognized the excellence of the Court, and in a letter to Story commended the judicial work of Taney.

branch of the government." But this should be qualiﬁed by the reﬂection that the mandate of the Court may be functionless unless the executive recog

nizes and enforces it.

The physical

power of the federal government is under the control of the executive and of Con gress. There is a suggestion of a. grim possibility in Jackson's comment on the

We may dismiss without fur

The Chief Justice took his seat on the

opinion of the court in Worcester v. State

bench at circuit at the April term, 1836,

of Georgia, 6 Pet. 575,

in Baltimore, and at the January term,

"John Marshall

has made his decision, now let him en force it," or in the subsequent action of

President Lincoln, who ignored the writ

of habeas corpus from the same tribunal,

1837, presided for the ﬁrst time over the full court. Without making radical de partures Taney sought to bring the

although Congress had not then voted to authorize him to suspend the privi

structure framed by Marshall into greater harmony with the plans of the makers of the Constitution. It has been

lege.

well said,3 "It is owing largely to the

looked

It should not however, be over

in

any consideration

of

the

functions of the court, or the judicial

conduct of its members as expressed in opinions on constitutional law,

genius of these two great Chief Justices that an indestructible nation of inde structible states is due. Who in this

cially is this true of appointments to

work performed the greater service is a. question which will be answered acc0rd~ ing to the political views of the person to whom it is propounded.” No history

the Supreme Court of the United States,

of the American nation worthy of the

which from its formation have always

the effect of the political convictions of

name can be written which does not deal with their work. As well might the historical student expect to compre hend the development of the English people without some knowledge of West

a lifetime.

minster Hall, the Assizes after Sedgemoor,

that judges carry their political views with them upon the bench, and espe

been largely partisan.

Taney, like his

predecessors, even when clothed with

the judicial ermine, was not exempt from It was repeatedly said by

opponents that he owed his appoint

and the Trial of the Seven Bishops.

ment to his aid and support of General Jackson in his contest with Biddle over

Historians and essayists vary accordingly as they write from the point of approach

the United States Bank, and because in obedience to the wishes of his chief he

3Great American Lawyers, v. 4, p. 77, “Taney,' by Prof. Mikell.