Page:The Dialogues of Plato v. 1.djvu/70

 Rh

whether a pretender knows or does not know that which he says that he knows: he will only know that he has a know­ ledge of some kind; but wisdom will not show him of what the knowledge is?

Plainly not.

Neither will he he able to distinguish the pnten<ler in medi­ cine from the true physician, nor between any other true and fal$e pmfessor of k11nwledge. 1,f't us consider the matter in this way: If the wise man or any other man wants to distin­ guish the true physician from the false, how will he proceed? He will not talk to him about medicine; and that, as we were saying, is the only thing which the physician understands.

True.

And, nn the other hand, the physician knows nothing of science, for this has been assumed to be the province of wisdom.

True.

And further, since medicine is science, we must infer that he does not know anything of medicinf'.

Exactly.

Then the wise man may indeed know that the physician has some kind of science or knowledge; but when he wants to discover the nature of this he will ask, What is the subject­ matter? For the several sciences are distinguished not by the mere fact that they are sciences, but by the nature of their subjects. Is not that true?

Quite true.

And medicine is distinguished from other sciences as having the subject-matter of health and disease?

Yes.

And he who would enquire into the nature of medicine must pursue the enquiry into health and disease, and not into what is extraneous?

True.

And he who judges rightly will judge of the physician as

a physician in what relates to these?

He will.

Ile will consider whether what he says is true, and whether what he does is right, in relation to health and disease?