Page:The Complete Peerage Ed 2 Vol 2.djvu/439

 BURGH 423 of Sir Thomas Cobham, of Sterborough, Surrey,('') according to modern doctrine dejure Lord Cobham (of Sterborough), by Anne, da. of Humphrey (Stafford), Duke of Buckingham. She d. 26 June 1526. He d. 20 Aug. 1528. Inq. p. m. 7 Nov. (1528) 20 Hen. VIII. III. 1528. 3. Thomas (Burgh), Lord Burgh, s. and h., aged 40 and more at his father's death, and then a knight.('') Sheriff of CO. Lincoln 1518-19 and 1524-25. He took, his seat 2 Dec. 1529, and continued to be sum. until i Mar. (155 1/2) 6 Edw. VI, 2 years afte7 his death.('^) On 2 Dec. (1529) 21 Hen. VIII he was admitted to the House as "Lord Borough de Gaynesboro,"('^) while another writ, 31 Hen. VIII, was directed Thome Bourgh. He ;«., istly, 1496, Agnes, da. of Sir William Tyrwhitt, of Kettleby, co. Lincoln, by Anne, da. of Sir Robert Constable, of Flamborough, co. York. He m., 2ndly, Alice, widow of Edmund Rokewood (who was bur. at Euston), and before that of Sir Thomas Beding- FELD (who d. 1538), da. of William London. He ^.28 Feb. 1549/50. Inq. p. m. 4 June 1550. Will dat. at Euston, Suffolk, 14 Feb. (1549/50) 4 Edw. VI, pr. 20 Nov. following. Her will, directing her burial to be at Euston, dat. 25 Mar. 1558, pr. 1559. IV. 1550. 4. William (Burgh), Lord Burgh, 3rd and yst., but 1st surv. s. and h.(') by ist wife, aged 28 at his father's death. He took his seat 26 Jan. 155 1/2, and continued to be sum. until 16 Jan. (i 580/1) 23 Eliz.(^ He was one of the Peers on the trial of the Duke of Norfolk in 1573. Hew. Katharine, 2nd da. of Edward (Clinton), Earl of Lincoln, by his ist wife, Elizabeth, Dowager Baroness Talboys, da. of Sir John Blount. He d. at Lambeth, 10 Sep., and was bur. 2 Oct. 1584, at Lingfield, Surrey. Inq. p. m. 9 June (1585) 27 Eliz. Admon. as of Sterborough, Surrey, 21 Oct. 1584. His widow was bur. 14 Aug. 1621, at Lingfield. Her admon. as of Sterborough, 12 Aug. 1622. (^) Two of the ancestors of this Sir Thomas had been sum. to Pari., but there is no proof of their sitting, which probably is the reason why the Barony has not been claimed. V.G. ('') He was knighted in 15 13, either at Flodden 9 Sep., or in Touraine 5 Dec. i^) The statement as to his being sum. after death is made on the authority of the Pari. Pawn, but there was no new Pari, in Mar. 155 1/2, merely a fresh meeting of the one elected in 1547. V.G. ('^) J. H. Round in his Peerage Studies, pp. 334-5 and 336, treats this as a new creation, and points out that the Barony was ranked in 1536 [Lords' Journals) after Hussey, Windsor, and Wentworth, which were all created I and 2 Dec. 1529. V.G. ('') Sir Edward Burgh, who d. v.p. and s.p. before Apr. 1533 (having m. about 1529, Katharine Parr, afterwards Queen Consort to Henry VIII), and Sir Thomas Burgh (whose children, he being then deceased, were, though born in wedlock, bas- tardised by Act of Pari. (1542-43) 34 Henry VIII) were his elder brothers. (') The statement that he is miscalled " Thomas " in the writs on and after II Jan. 1562/3, rests on the authority of Dugdale's Summonses, but all the lists of writs in that work from p. 519 to p. 529 are a mere fabrication, and absolutely worth- less as an authority. V.G.