Page:The Complete Peerage Ed 2 Vol 1.djvu/473

 BARHAM COMPLETE PEERAGE 423 He m., istly, Mary, sister of William, ist Viscount Primrose [S.], and 1st da. of Sir William Primrose, Bart. [S.], by Mary, da. of Patrick Scott, of Thirlestane. She, who was b. 20 June 1677, ^- ^-P-^- He m., 2ndly (cont. dat. 6 Aug. 1 708), Margaret, ist. da. of Robert Dundas, of Arniston, a Lord of Session. He d. about 1712. (") His widow d. 30 Mar. 17 17. Fun. entry at Lyon office. IV. 1 712 4. James (Hamilton), Lord Bargeny [S.], onlys. and to h. by 2nd wife, b. 29 Nov. 17 10. He completed his 1736. education by foreign travel, but d. unm., at Edinburgh, 28 Mar., and was bur. 5 Apr. 1736, in the Church of Holyrood House, aged 25. On his death the issue male of the grantee, and in all probability the Peerage itself, became extinct. Q) BARHAM BARONY. I. Charles Middleton, 2nd s. of Robert M., f) Col- . lector of the Customs at Bo'ness, co. Linlithgow, by ^' Helen, da. of Charles Dundas, of Arniston, co. Mid- lothian, b. at Leith 14 Oct. 1726 ; Lieut. R.N. 1745, Post Capt. 22 May 1758 ; distinguished himself, in 1761, when in command of the Emerald frigate, in the West Indies ; Comptroller of the Navy 1778-90 ; Elder Brother of the Trinity House 1781-1813. He, being of Barham Court, and Teston, Kent, was cr. a Baronet on 23 Oct. 1781 (with a spec. rem., (**) failing his issue male, to his s.-in-law, Gerard Noel Edwardes) ; M.P. (Tory) for Rochester 1784-90; Rear Adm. 1787 ; Vice Adm. 1793 ; a Lord of the Admiralty 1794-95 ; Adm. of the Blue 1795 ; First com- missioner for revising the civil affairs of the navy ; and ist Lord of the Admiralty C^) 30 Apr. 1805-06. P.C. i May 1805. On i May 1805, he C) " With kind Bargeny faithful to his word, whom Heaven made good and social, tho' a Lord. " (Epitaph, by Hamilton of Bangour). V.G. C") The Lords of Session [S.] in their return, 1740, report that as they cannot discover from the records the limitation of the dignity " they cannot take upon them to say whether it is extinct or not." (See Robertson, p. 213.) The Peerage must have been a male fief, as the succession of the 3rd Lord, the h. male was allowed, instead of that of the h. gen. And even supposing the patent to have been to heirs male whom- soever, these, the grantee being illegitimate, would have ended with the heirs male oj his body. (°) This Robert was grandson of Alexander M., next yr. br. of John, ist Earl Middleton [S.] 1660. V.G. C*) A rare instance at that date of a rem. to one whose relationship was not in the male line. See, however, the Barony of Basset of Stratton, in 1797, as also the Dukedom of Marlborough, for a yet more extended rem. in 1706. See also vol. iii, Appendix F. i^) This appointment led to a quarrel between Pitt and Sidmouth, the latter desiring to appoint the Earl of Buckinghamshire, and to the two last leaving the Ministry. V.G.