Page:The Complete Peerage Ed 1 Vol 4.djvu/322

 324 ISLES — IV ICR. Barony [S.] John (Macdonald), Earl of Ross [S.], against whom I 1 478 as " *^°^ n > ^'" r ' "f R° sa a "d Lard of the Isles," a summons of treason ^ ' win executed 16 Oct. 1475, he being forfeited accordingly in Dee. ■'jag i 1475 ; lie was, however, rehabilitated by Pari., 10 July 1476, on liJO which day he rc.nr/ncd his Earldom and other dignities to the Crown, and was oii the 15th cr. a Lord of Pari, as LORD 01" THE ISLES [S.], with rem., failing the heirs male of his body, to Angus and John, his illegit. sons, in like manner, with rem. to heirs whatsoever.! '■') In 1481 he renewed his treasonable correspondence with England, and was apparently! b ) again outlawed and attainted, about 1493, whereby all his honours would become forfeited. He d., s.p. legit. 1498 at the Monastery of Paisley.! 0 ) See fuller particulars of him under "Ross" Earldom [&] ITHIN, see EYTHLN. IVEAGH. See " Magexxis of Iveagii, co. Down," Viseouidey Tl. cr. 1623; forfeited, 1691. Barony. /, Edward Cecil Guiness, of Caslleknock, co. Dublin, J 189 I J' 1 "- bl ' - " f Artmir Edward, 1st Baron Aiimlai N cf Ashfi.hu, being 3d and yst. s. of Sir Benjamin Lee GtriNESS, 1st Bart.,( l1 ) by Elizabeth, 3d da. of Edward Gitinkss, of Dublin, was A. 10 Nov. 1M7, and bap. at St. Ann's, Dubliu ; ed. at Trin. Coll., Dublin ; Sheriff of Dublin, 1876 ; High Sheriff of co. Dublin, 1885; was cr. a Baronet 27 May 1885, as "of Castleknock, co. Dublin," on the occasion of the visit of the Prince of Wales to Ireland, and was cr. 19 Jan. 1891, BAKON IVEAGH of Iveagh, co. Down. He m. 20 May 1873, at Ascot, Berks, Adelaide Maria, da. of Richard Samuel Gdinkss, of Deepwell. co. Dublin, by Katherine Frances, da. of .Sir Charles Jenkinson, 10th Bart. Principal Residence. Farmleigh, Castleknock, c". Dublin. EVER. See "Gambiek of Ivei?, co. Buckingham," Barony (Gamhh<r), cr. 1807 ; ex. 1833. (») " See " Uiddell," p. 572, where Lord Mansfield's " brilliant discovery that must convulse and electrify Scottish legal antiquaries" is severely ridiculed. This was no less than that there were Baronies " by writ" in Scotland as well as in England and that " the creation of the Lord of the Isles in 1476 was by writ." ( b ) It is possible that the forfeiture alluded to in grauts of certain of his lauds in 1498 by the Crown may allude to the [earlier] forfeiture of 1475. {') After his death the peerage title was never assumed. Of the two persons named in the spec, rem-, John had d., a. p. legit, 20 years before his father, while Angus, who tried to keep possession of the Isles as against the King, d., B.p. legit., before 1503. There appears to have been a rising by the western chiefs in 1404, in favour of the illegit. son of Angus, and again, in 1513, in favour of Sir Donald (Gauja) grandson and h. of Celestine, an illegit. br. of John, Earl of Ross. Subsequently, Donald Macdou.dd of Slate, great grandson and h. of Hugh, another illegit. br. of the said Earl John, asserted by force his claim to the hirdship oj the Isles (as heir male of John, Earl of Ross), and was shot dead 1537 and attainted. The Barons Macdonald of Slate [I.], are heirs male, though not heirs ycncrul of this Donald. In " Riddell," p. 572, note 2, the learned author remarks that " from a consideration of the evidence in the matter.it now strikes me that the Macdoualds of Dunovaig aid (Jlins, of whom the noble family of Autrem are represented as being sprung, seem to have the l ight to the lawful male representation and chieftainship of these Macdonalds, Lords oj the Isles." J See vol. i, p. 119, note "b," sab « Ardilaun."