Page:The Complete Peerage Ed 1 Vol 4.djvu/275

 HUN< 1ERF0RD. 20 .Tan. (1451/2), 30 Hon. VI. He served in the Freuoli wars, and was taken prisoner at Chatillon, July 1453, not being released till after more than seven years, and then Dot without a very large ransom. He sue. 14 May 1459, to the flarany of /fitnr/erfml but was never sum. therein to Pari. He fought 29 March 1401, for Henry VI. at the defeat at Towton anil was consequently al'niattd when the Baroniet of Sungtrfard and Dc Molcyns became forfeited. On IS March 14tjl.be was taken prisoner at the Lancastrian defeat at Hexham; was beheaded at Newcastle and bar. at Salisbury cathedral. His widow IH. Sir Oliver Maninciia.m and was bur. at Stoke Pogis afsd. M.I.(») »*«*»# IV. 1485. Mary, em jure Baroxessi Botreaux, grandaughtoi and heir, being da. and h. of Sir Thomas [lONGKRFORD, by Ann, da. of Henry i'Pkiu y), Eaiij. ok NohtH'-Mhehlanp, which Thomas was s. and h. of the last (attainted') Lord ami was Itimscl/ attainted and put to death as a traitor in Jan. (1468/9), 8 Ed. IV. This lady, 6. about 14ti6, »««. on the death, 7 Feb. 1477/8, of her great grandmother Margaret abovenamed as [dc jure) mo jure BARONESS BQTREATJX.( b ) being then 11 years (.Id. She m.(°) before 5 Feb. 1481, Sir Edward Hastings, K.B. (a. and h. ap. of William, Loud Hastings de Hastings) who there- upon was sum. (v.p.) to Pari, as a Baron (LOUP HASTINGS DE HUNOERFORIJ), by write IS Nov. (1482), 22 Ed. IV., to 16 Jan. (1496/7), 12 Hen. VII., directed " Edwardo Haslingt dc Jlunijcrford,"^) altho' the attainder (of 1461) affecting the Barony of Hungerford was still in force. He d. S Nov. 1506, and was bur. at Blackfriars, London. Will (in which he styles himself "Edward Hastings, Knt., Lord lTastiniis{") and Hungerford") dat. 4 Nov. ]506.( r ) His wife became in 14S5 (in addition to her title of Baroness Botreauxl sun jure BARONESS HUNGERFORD and BARONESS DE MOLEYNS(fc') by the reversal, at that date, of the attaiuder of her grandfather, Lord Hungerford, ahovenamcd which affected both those dignities. She m. in 1511 Sir Richard Sac:ikvkhki.i., of Ratcliffe-on-Soar, Notts, whose will dat. 29 March was pr. 26 June 1534. The suo jure Baroness was living 152S and possibly later, but was dead before 1531, being bur. at Newark, co. Leicester, as was her second husband. ( a ) This is given in " Dugdale " and it sets forth clearly that she m. firstly Robert, Lord Hungerford, and secondly Sir Oliver Mauuingham ; yet shortly afterwards Dugdale assigns to this Robert a second wife, viz., Catharine, da. of Reginald (West), Lord de la Warr, to whom he ascribes (as Robert's younger sons) Walter and Leonard) whom just before lie had attributed to Eleanor Molius. ( b ) See p. 186, note " b," sub " Hastings," as to the probability of her not being then considered as so entitled owing to the attainder of her father and grandfather (thro' whom she inherited the same) notwithstanding that they firedeceased the suo jure Baroness Botreaux. ( c ) The large estates (among which Farleigh- Hungerford was not [see p. 275, note " d " ] ), which this lady brought to her husband are set out by Dugdale (vol ii, p. 211), from a MS. in possession of Theophilus, Earl of Huntingdon. ( d ) This Barony must thertfore be considered as a creation of 11S2, inasmuch as Sir Edward was not entitled to the Barony of Hastings till the death of bis father, while as to the Barony of Hungerford to which his wife was the heir it was still under the attainder of 1461. (°) By the death of his father (beheaded 13 June 14S3, but apparently never attainted) he became entitled to the Barony of Hastings (cr, 1161) and tho' he himself was never sum. to Pari, as such yet his s. and h. George Hastings was so sum. from 17 Ozt. 1509, to 3 Nov. 1529. ( f ; Tea. Vet., p. 475. (6) She WBI not, however, contented with the three Baronies (Botreaux, Hunger- ford, and Do Moleyns), to which she was entitled, but credited herself with no less than ttx (styling herself ''Lady Jlunyerfe.rd, Hornet, Hotreaux, Mods, Molines, and Peiercll"), of which Hornet and Pecciell (two of those so assumed) were never Pari. Baronies, while as to Meets (the other) she was only one of the coheirs thereto. See p. 136, note " b," su5 " Hastings."