Page:The Complete Peerage Ed 1 Vol 3.djvu/45

 DELAMERE — DE LA POLE. 43 1L 1855. 2. Hugh (Chol.moxdeley), Baron Dela.mere op Vale ROYAL, s. ami h., 6. 3 Oct. 1811, at Vale Royal ; ed. at Eton and CU. Ch., Oxford ; matric. 21 May 1828 ; sometime Lieut, in the 1st Life Guards ; Hon. Col. 3d Batt. Cheshire Militia; M.P. for Denbighshire, 1840-41 ; for Mont- gomeryshire, 1841-48. He m. firstly, 23 March 1848, Sarah, 2d da. of Thomas Robert (Hay), 10th Earl of Kinnoui.l [S.j, by Louisa Burton, da. of Admiral Sir Charles Rowley, Bart. She, who was b. 1 Dec. 1828, d. 17 Feb. 1859, in Portman Square, Midx. He m. secondly, 27 Dec. I860, at St. James', Westm., Augusta, 1st da. of the Rt. Hon. Sir George Hamilton Seymour, G.C.B., by Gertrude, da. of Henry Otway (Brand), Lord Dacre. He d. 1 Aug. 1887, at Vale Royal, and was bur. at Whitegate. His widow, who was b. 6 Nov. 1835, was living 18S9. III. 1887. S. Hugh (Cholmondblhy), Baron Delamere or Vale Royal, s. and h., b. 28 April 1S70, in London. Family Estates... These, in 18S3, consisted of 6,791 acres in Cheshire, worth £11,031 a year. Principal residence, Yale Royal, near Northwieh, Cheshire. DE LANCASTRE, or LANCASTER. Barony by writ, G Feb. 1298/9, issued to Henry Plantagenet, 2d s. of Edmund, Earl ok Lancaster) being directed " Henrico dc Lancastrc, ncpoti Regit " ; See under " Lancaster," DE LA POEE, sco « La Poer."C) DE LA POLE. 1. Michael De La Pole was sum, to Pari, as a Baron (LORD DE LA POLE) by writs 20 Jauy. (1365/6) 39 Ed. Ill to 2S Sep. (1384) 8 Ric. II ;(k) the writ of 1 Dec. (1376) 50 Ed. Ill being directed "MUM Dc La, Pole, admirallo rcois/otce naiu'um. versus partes Borcalcs." On 6 Aug. 1385 he was cr. EARL OF SUFFOLK. See fuller particulars under that title. He was, however, attainted in the Pari, of Feb. 1338, whereby all /us honours tccrc forfeited. He d. II. 1397, 2. Michael (De La Pole), Earl of Suffolk, Lord de to La Pole, s. and h., restored to his father's dignities in the Pari, of 1399. (1397) 21 Ric. II, but the proceedings of this Pari, being annulled by the Pari, of (1399) 1 Hen. IV, and those of the Pari, of 1388 being affirmed, this Barony fell again under the former attainder of 1388. The Earldom of Suffolk was conferred on the said Michael and the heirs male of his body by patent of 15 Nov. 1399, but this Barony was not therein mentioned (4th Peerage Report, p. 6). He d. 11 Sep. 1415. See fuller particulars under " Suffolk " Earldom of, cr. 1399. »***»««* ( n ) The name of the Barony [I.], the right to which was confirmed by the Crown, 19 Dec. 1767, was " La Poer." Both forms, however, are said to be wrong (in the " Her. and Gen." (vol. ii, p. 70), where the true form is stated to be Lc Poer, from "Rogerus Pauper," the first of the family who emigrated to Ireland. ( b ) There is proof iu the Rolls of. Pari, of his sitting. Barony by I. 13GC, to 1388. 5 Sep. 1389.