Page:The Complete Peerage Ed 1 Vol 1.djvu/177

 ARUNDEL. 155 with the Princess Mary to conduct her to her husband, the Prince of Orange, and never returned to England. In answer to a petition (which he had presented in 1641), signed by sixteen Peers, praying to be restored to the Dulxdnm of his grandfather, the King, by patent, dated at Oxford C June 1644, cr. him EARL OF NORFOLK, with ran. baling the heirs male of his body, to those of his uncle Thomas, late Earl of Suffolk, rein, to his uncle Lord William Howard with like remainder. He m. in 1605, Alethea &d da. and coh. but eventually sole h. of Gilbert (T.u.nnT), 7th Earl (IK SsSEWSBDKf, hy Mary, da. of Sir William Cavk.nuisii. lie tl. at Padua 26 Sep. 1 646, aged 61, and was bar. at Aiundel. Axtroon, 13 Nov. 1646. One will is dat. 28 Mar. 1617. Another will dat. 3 Sep. 1641, pr. at fork 23 July 1 t>47.( a ) His widow, who on 7 Dec. 1(551 (on the </. of her aurv. sister s.p.) inherited the Baronies of FoitNrvAt. (1295), STHAMOE ok BlaOKMBBB (1308), and Talbot (1331), d. 24 May 1654 at Amsterdam, and was bur. at Uotherham, CO. York.!, 0 ) Adunm. 1659, in Court of Delegates, to William [Howard], Viscount Stafford, yr. s. of deceased. Further admon. 8 Jan. 1714-5 to Henry (Stafford-Howard), Karl of Stafford, grandson and next of kin. [Sin James Howard, sttfled LORD MALTRAVERS, s. and h. a p. bap. 17 July 1607 at the Chapel Royal, Whitehall, the King (James I) being his Godfather. On 3 Nov. 1616 he was made K.B. at the creation of the Prince of Wales. He d, (of the small pox), under age and unm., at Ghent in Flanders July 1624 and was bur. at Arundel. 1 XXVII. 1646. 22 m 15. Henry Frederick (Howard), Earl of Ahundei., &c, 2nd but 1st surv. s. and h. b. 15 Aug. 1008. He, together with his eldest br. was made K B 3 Nov. 1616. On 13 April 1639 he was sum. to Pari, (in his father's Barony) as LORD MOWBRAY.O and placed at the upper end of the Baron's Bench on the 16 April following.^) He was a zealous Royalist, was present at the battle of Edgehill, and was with the Court at Oxford, by which University, on 1 Nov. 1644, he was made M.A. In 1648 he was fined by Pari. P) See notes concerning him " N. & Q.," 3rd a., ii, 403. The character given of him by Clarendon is by no means flattering, insinuating an over-weening pride and in- competence— e.(/., that he went to court but seldom "because there, only, was a greater man than himself " — that " He was willing to be thought a scholar" because of his purchase of statues and collection of medals, but " as to all parts of learning he was most illiterate " — that his dress was " very different from that of the time, such as men had only beheld in the pictures of the most considerable men, all which drew the eyes of most and the reverence of many towards him " — that he was " not much concerned for religion," nor " inclined to this or that party," but " had little other affection for the nation than as he had a share in it, in which, like the great Leviathan, he might sport hinisclf ; from which he withdrew as soon as he discerned the repose thereof was likely to be disturbed and died in Italy under the same doubtful character of religion in which he lived." Evelyn, however, speaks of him very differently as " ihe magnificent Earl of Arundel, my noble friend while he lived." ( c ) For her was built by Nicholas Stone, in 1638, " Taut Ham.," near Buckingham House but just outride St. James" Park. This descended to her second s. Lord Stafford, whose name is still preserved in Stafford How. — See Cunningham's " London," It was thro' her that the Howard family inherited the Manor of Worksop, Notts, held by Grant Serjeantiy. See Taylor's " Glory of Regality," p. 13S. '■!) The cnUrelt/ of the Barony of Mowbhay (and not a moiety only, as, till recently, has been generally supposed) via vested in his father, the abeyance of it (as well as that of the Barony of Seokayh) having (doubtless) been terminated by Hit: III in favor of the Howard family (who, with the Berkeley family, were coheirs to a moiety of it), inas- much as it is certain that that King addressed the Duke of Norfolk (John Howard) as ' Lord Mowbray and Segrave," The House of Lords, (when the Barony of Mowbray was assigned, on 27 July 1877 to Lord Stourton (the senior coheir of the Barony thus loy Richard III] terminated), though they did not express!// state that the abeyance t i a?' 1 termi,v ' vteu h JM* 'It, came to the resolution that at some period subsequent ™ 1481 but before the time of Elizabeth, it was terminated in favor of the Howard laimly a resolution which (coupled with the recognition of the Barony above quoted, tpefact that no other snch recognition took place in the 16th century) amounts (practically) to the same thing. oediately '| l""!"^-'' ^'""^ A - ber £ nyenn y 1,11(1 Lonl Audley were the three next im-