Page:The Cambridge History of American Literature, v3.djvu/264

 246 Later Philosophy ]! picture or certain discords bring about richer harmony. The Absolute himself suffers our daily crucifixion, but his triumph- ant spiritual nature asserts itself in us through that very suffer- ing. This profoundly consoling argument, which both elevates us and sinks our individual sorrows in a great cosmic drama, is, of course, an expression of the historical Christian wisdom of the beatitude of suffering. But it offended the traditional individualism which finds its theologic and metaphysical ex- pression in the doctrine of free will. If each individual is a [part of the divine self, how can we censure the poor wretch who fails to live up to the proper standard ?' It is significant of the unconventionality of Royce's thought that he never attached great importance to the question of blame or the free and inten-"» tional nature of sin. The evils uppermost in his mind are those resulting from ignorance, from the citimsiness of inexperience rather than from wilful misdeeds; and, unlike most American philosophers, he rightly saw that the religious conscience of mankind has always regarded sin as something which happens to us even against our will. Against the complacent belief of the comfortable that no one suffers or succeeds except through his own sins or virtues, Royce opposes the view of St. Paul that we are all members of each other's bodies and that "no man amongst us is wholly free from the consequences or from the degradation involved in the crimes of his less enlightened or 'less devoted neighbours, that the solidarity of mankind links i'the crimes of each to the sorrows of all. " J For the elaboration of the social nature of our intellectual 1 as well as of our moral concepts, Royce was largely indebted 'to suggestions from Peirce. In his earliest books we find no direct reference to Peirce. We can only conjecture that he jowed to that man of genius the emphasis on the social nature ioi truth and the formulation of the ethical imperative: Live in 'i the light of all possible consequences . But with the publica- I tion of the two volumes of The World and the Individual (1901), Royce's indebtedness to Peirce becomes explicit and steadily increases thereafter. The main thesis of that book, the reconciliation of the exist- ence of the Absolute Self with the genuine individuality of our ' See Howison in The Conception of God, by Royce, Le Conte, Howison, and Mezes.