Page:The Cambridge History of American Literature, v2.djvu/105

 Lesser Orators 89 reflections and with stern and caustic comments on men and events. The years after his presidency, when he was a repre- sentative in Congress, have given his name a peculiar lustre, for he laboured there boldly and almost alone. He was too intense in his devotion to what he thought right, too unbending, too severe, too outspoken, too blunt perhaps, to be a political leader or a popular idol, but that he had power is plain, for by dint of fearless speech he won the well-earned title of "old man eloquent," — and eloquent he undoubtedly was, when he rose to his height in defence of principles he believed just and sacred. Without descending into vulgar abuse, he could indulge in scathing attack, while his wide learning and experience in pubHc affairs gave him advantage over most of his adversaries. Prom even a hurried sketch of this period we cannot omit to mention the names of a few other men who were well known in this time and deserve to be known now. Albert Gallatin (1761-1849), one of the ablest and most learned of American statesmen, served his country in Congress, as foreign minister, and as secretary of the treasury; he was an administrator rather than a publicist or orator, but some of his pamphlets and reports' were of marked ability. Roger Brooke Taney (1777-1864), secretary of the treasury under Jackson, and chief justice of the United States from 1836 to 1864, was a learned jurist, whose fame was clouded for the later part of his life by his opinion in the Dred Scott case. Josiah Quincy (1772-1864), an orator of no mean power, represented during the earlier part of his Hfe the narrow New England Federalism which was so bitterly opposed to the politics of Jefferson and Madison. Edward Everett (i 794-1 865) occupied various pub- lic positions — ^member of Congress, governor of Massachusetts, minister to England, president of Harvard College. Although long active in political affairs he won chief destinction by lec- ttires on literary subjects and by orations of an occasional character. In no other speeches of his generation, probably in no others in our whole history, do we find the same pre- , cision and elegance or equal refinement, ease, and grace; in no ^/ others are there such marks of real distinction in expression. More than a word should be given to Thomas H. Benton (i 782-1 858), if the real importance of his work be given proper