Page:The Analyst; or, a Discourse Addressed to an Infidel Mathematician.djvu/99

Rh Method, in the Application nevertheles of the Analyis to Geometry, Men may not have admitted fale Principles and wrong Methods of Reaoning? Qu. 46. Whether although Algebraical Reaonings are admitted to be ever o jut, when confined to Signs or Species as general Repreentatives of Quantity, you may not nevertheles fall into Error, if, when you limit them to tand for particular things, you do not limit your elf to reaon conitently with the Nature of uch particular things? And whether uch Error ought to be imputed to pure Algebra?

Qu. 47. Whether the View of modern Mathematicians doth not rather eem to be the coming at an Expreion by Artifice, than the coming at Science by Demontration?

Qu. 48. Whether there may not be ound Metaphyics as well as unound? Sound as well as unound Logic? And whether the modern Analytics may not be brought under one of thee Denominations, and which? Qu. 49. Whe-