Page:The Analyst; or, a Discourse Addressed to an Infidel Mathematician.djvu/98

88 the ame Rules of Logic do not obtain in both Caes? And whether we have not a right to expect and demand the ame Evidence in both? Qu. 43. Whether an Algebrait, Fluxionit, Geometrician or Demontrator of any kind can expect indulgence for obcure Principles or incorrect Reaonings? And whether an Algebraical Note or Species can at the end of a Proces be interpreted in a Sene, which could not have been ubtituted for it at the beginning? Or whether any particular Suppoition can come under a general Cae which doth not conit with the reaoning thereof? Qu. 44. Whether the Difference between a mere Computer and a Man of Science be not, that the one computes on Principles clearly conceived, and by Rules evidently demontrated, whereas the other doth not? Qu. 45. Whether, although Geometry be a Science, and Algebra allowed to be a Science, and the Analytical a mot lent