Page:Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.pdf/75

Rh , dissenting considerations rather than move beyond them." Ante, at 21. And it agrees that "racial quotas. . . rais[e] serious constitutional concerns." Ante, at 20. Yet it still reads the FHA to authorize disparate-impact claims. We should avoid, rather than invite, such "difficult constitutional questions." Ante, at 22. By any measure, the Court today makes a serious mistake.

I would interpret the Fair Housing Act as written and so would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.