Page:Systems-of-Sanskrit-Grammar-SK Belvalkar.pdf/93

 [§ 65 Interpolations in Katantra-Satrapatha 85 samaraferar att fear: 1 fferat mafan Whoever be the real author, it is a later addition to the original is clear that the sutrapāṭha. Another clear case of later interpolations in the Kätantra sūtrapātha is furnished by the three sections in rectangular brackets-fama, e, and somente which are absent in Durgasimha's commentary but which are regularly found included in the Kašmirian sūtra- patha. And even in the sections which are common to both these there are so many variant readings that we are probably justified in inferring that the Katautra sūtra. patha was in a very unsettled and changeable form when it reached Käśmir-probably long before it found an ex- positor in Durgasimba. Finally, the after belonging to the second prakaraṇa seems likewise to be not of the authorship of Sarvavarman. The sotras in this section (like those in the s given by the Käśmirian tradition) naturally arrange them- selves into anushṭubh stanzas; and although some sūtras here and there from this section have been in Professor Eggeling's edition of the Katantra printed as such stanzas, still this general fact has not yet received sufficient atten- tion. The inference is obvious. If Sarvavarman did not think it necessary to teach the section to his Royal son as Durgasimba; and by an Unadipatha put together by Durgasimha himself. This latter work differs cousider- ably from the train- cluded in the regular Kué mirian sutrapatha. sútras. 2 Outside Kasmir the place of Bühler's report for 1875-76, these sections is taken up by 3 A few such are collected in Dr. a LignusEsana in 86 Trys, attributed to Dargatma, whe is probably not the same pap page oxxxiv, 1. Vararuchi is often an alias of Katyayana. The Indi. office Ms. no. 855 purports to be Vararuchi's com. on his own s, which are just these