Page:Smith v. United States (2023).pdf/2

2

(2) The historical background of the Venue and Vicinage Clauses similarly does not demand a departure from the retrial rule. The common-law “vicinage” right presumptively entitled defendants to a jury of the “neighbourhood” where the crime was allegedly committed. 4 W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 344. As a practical matter, this right imposed a venue requirement: Trials needed to be held at the location where “the matter of fact issuable” allegedly occurred to allow the “Inhabitants whereof” to serve on the jury. E. Coke, 1 Institutes of the Laws of England §193, p. 125. History reveals that the common-law vicinage right was highly prized by the founding